155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36318924)
41. Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.
Lago V; Tiermes M; Padilla-Iserte P; Matute L; Gurrea M; Domingo S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 32540498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Zhu T; Chen X; Zhu J; Chen Y; Yu A; Chen L; Shou H; Wu M; Zhang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jul; 27(6):1222-1227. PubMed ID: 28640767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
Melamed A; Ramirez PT
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S; Cai J; Li R; Wang Y; Zhao J; Huang Y; Xu L; Yang Q; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 35061066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: what shall we do after the LACC trial?
Hillemanns P; Hertel H; Klapdor R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Aug; 302(2):289-292. PubMed ID: 32495017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
Kim M; Kong TW; Kim S; Kim SC; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park JY; Suh DH; Shim SH; Lee KH; Lee SJ; Lee JK; Lim MC
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e104. PubMed ID: 31328466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?
Moufawad G; Laganà AS; Habib N; Chiantera V; Giannini A; Ferrari F; Vitagliano A; Della Corte L; Bifulco G; Sleiman Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
