These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36319191)

  • 1. Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre.
    Ball S; McKerrow M; Murphy A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 70(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36319191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
    Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
    Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OPTIMAL COLLIMATION SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY.
    Pazanin A; Skrk D; O'Driscoll JC; McEntee MF; Mekis N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 32363403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of effective dose and risk for different collimation options used in AP shoulder radiography.
    Singh T; Muscroft N; Collier N; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):394-399. PubMed ID: 34887196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit.
    Stephenson-Smith B; Neep MJ; Rowntree P
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 33826800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography.
    Brookfield H; Manning-Stanley A; England A
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 25835404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beam Collimation during Lumbar Spine Radiography: A Retrospective Study.
    Karami V; Zabihzadeh M
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2017 Jun; 7(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 28580331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
    Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study.
    Alsleem H; Davidson R; Al-Dhafiri B; Alsleem R; Ameer H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 66(4):229-237. PubMed ID: 31697039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
    Sabol JM
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimisation of the lateral lumbar spine projection using an air-gap technique.
    Bellizzi A; Zarb F
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 32052755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose reduction in scoliosis patients: low-dose full-spine radiography with digital flat panel detector and image stitching system.
    Grieser T; Baldauf AQ; Ludwig K
    Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):645-9. PubMed ID: 21614741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study.
    Chan CTP; Fung KKL
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 31052066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Use of Digital Side Markers (DSMs) and Cropping in Digital Radiography.
    Hayre CM; Blackman S; Eyden A; Carlton K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 31176431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure.
    Powys R; Robinson J; Kench PL; Ryan J; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e497-505. PubMed ID: 22374279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.