These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36319191)

  • 21. The Use of Digital Side Markers (DSMs) and Cropping in Digital Radiography.
    Hayre CM; Blackman S; Eyden A; Carlton K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 31176431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry.
    Benchimol D; Koivisto J; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20180007. PubMed ID: 29722543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; White SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1237-43. PubMed ID: 18762634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Low-dose radiography of scoliosis in children. A comparison of methods.
    Kalmar JA; Jones JP; Merritt CR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Apr; 19(7):818-23. PubMed ID: 8202801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of patient doses for routine digital radiography procedures toward establishing an institutional diagnostic reference levels: A case study in Sri Lanka.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Wanninayake M; Sarasanandarajah S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13852. PubMed ID: 36448529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimisation of imaging technique used in direct digital radiography.
    Roberts JA; Evans SC; Rees M
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 16926471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Radiographic Diagnostic Reference Level Survey Using Patient and Phantom Data.
    Cropp RJ; Seslija P; Thakur Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 27103645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How reliable and safe is full-body low-dose radiography (LODOX Statscan) in detecting foreign bodies ingested by adults?
    Mantokoudis G; Hegner S; Dubach P; Bonel HM; Senn P; Caversaccio MD; Exadaktylos AK
    Emerg Med J; 2013 Jul; 30(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 22833594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].
    Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Neitzel U
    Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18259724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. IMPACT OF RADIATION FIELD SIZE ON ABSORBED ORGAN DOSES IN NEONATES UNDERGOING CHEST RADIOGRAPHY IN AN ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR PROJECTION: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION STUDY.
    Elshami W; Tekin HO; Abuzaid MM; Issa B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Feb; 198(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 35039861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrospective patient dose analysis of Ghana's first direct digital radiography system.
    Inkoom S; Togobo J; Emi-Reynolds G; Oddoye A; Ntiri TO; Gyekye PK
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22739831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography.
    Vaño E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Prieto C; González L; Rodríguez R; de las Heras H
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 17356174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Super-resolution variable-dose imaging in digital radiography: quality and dose reduction with a fluoroscopic flat-panel detector.
    Berliner L; Buffa A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Sep; 6(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 21298404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
    Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.