135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36319233)
1. Intelligibility and detectability of speech measured diotically and dichotically in groups of listeners with, at most, "slight" hearing loss.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2013. PubMed ID: 36319233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing.
Lalonde K; Walker EA; Leibold LJ; McCreery RW
Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 37415268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling binaural unmasking and the intelligibility of speech in noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Vicente T; Buchholz JM; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3275. PubMed ID: 34852607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A crew of listeners with no more than "slight" hearing loss who exhibit binaural deficits also exhibit reduced amounts of binaural interference.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2977. PubMed ID: 34717472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A crew of listeners with no more than "slight" hearing loss who exhibit binaural deficits also exhibit higher levels of stimulus-independent internal noise.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3188. PubMed ID: 32486817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.
Culling JF; Colburn HS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):517-27. PubMed ID: 10641660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Lőcsei G; Pedersen JH; Laugesen S; Santurette S; Dau T; MacDonald EN
Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27601071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.
Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of interaural delay, center frequency, and no more than "slight" hearing loss on precision of binaural processing: Empirical data and quantitative modeling.
Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):292. PubMed ID: 30075692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listening through hearing aids affects spatial perception and speech intelligibility in normal-hearing listeners.
Cubick J; Buchholz JM; Best V; Lavandier M; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2896. PubMed ID: 30522291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
Souza PE; Turner CW
J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.
Best V; Thompson ER; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 23649712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
