BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36319233)

  • 21. A binaural model implementing an internal noise to predict the effect of hearing impairment on speech intelligibility in non-stationary noises.
    Vicente T; Lavandier M; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3305. PubMed ID: 33261412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Masking of pure tones by broad-band noise in cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Fernandes MA; Wood EJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 7087412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
    Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
    Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No more than "slight" hearing loss and degradations in binaural processing.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2094. PubMed ID: 31046341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired listeners using a physiologically inspired auditory model.
    Zaar J; Carney LH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108553. PubMed ID: 35750575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
    Vermiglio AJ; Griffin S; Post C; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high-frequency hearing loss.
    Smits JT; Duifhuis H
    Audiology; 1982; 21(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 7103838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.