These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36319243)

  • 1. Temporal and spectral characteristics of conversational versus read fricatives in American English.
    Kharlamov V; Brenner D; Tucker BV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2073. PubMed ID: 36319243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
    Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English fricatives.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3962-73. PubMed ID: 19507978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustically distinct and perceptually ambiguous: ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Salish) fricatives.
    Mellesmoen G; Babel M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2959. PubMed ID: 32359305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-modal cross-linguistic perception of fricatives in clear speech.
    Cho S; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2609. PubMed ID: 32359282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development.
    Li F; Munson B; Edwards J; Yoneyama K; Hall K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):999-1011. PubMed ID: 21361456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source characteristics of voiceless dorsal fricatives.
    Redmon C; Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):242. PubMed ID: 30075652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Development of Alveolar and Alveopalatal Fricatives in French-Speaking Monolingual and Bilingual Children.
    Kehoe M; Philippart de Foy M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 36652703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective speech outcomes after surgical treatment for oral cancer: An acoustic analysis of a spontaneous speech corpus containing 32.850 tokens.
    Tienkamp TB; van Son RJJH; Halpern BM
    J Commun Disord; 2023; 101():106292. PubMed ID: 36521253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ingressive speech errors: a service evaluation of speech-sound therapy in a child aged 4;6.
    Hrastelj L; Knight RA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jul; 52(4):479-488. PubMed ID: 27891743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static and dynamic spectral characteristics of Swedish voiceless fricatives.
    Wikse Barrow C; Włodarczak M; Thörn L; Heldner M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Nov; 152(5):2588. PubMed ID: 36456287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels.
    Leung KK; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):45. PubMed ID: 27475131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-language similarities and differences in the uptake of place information.
    Wagner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4256-67. PubMed ID: 23742376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic characteristics of Greek fricatives.
    Nirgianaki E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):2964-76. PubMed ID: 24815276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic characteristics of Arabic pharyngealized obstruents in children with cochlear implants.
    Khwaileh FA; Flipsen P; Hammouri HM; Alzoubi FQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):893. PubMed ID: 31472526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy.
    Julien HM; Munson B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1836-49. PubMed ID: 22744140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English.
    Utman JA; Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):221-38. PubMed ID: 7938204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory.
    Wagner A; Ernestus M; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2267-77. PubMed ID: 17069322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.