These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36321015)

  • 1. The Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine With 1:100,000 Adrenaline and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in the Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar.
    Deshpande N; Jadhav A; Bhola ND; Gupta M
    Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29639. PubMed ID: 36321015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?
    Reddy KV; Jadhav A; Bhola N; Mishra A; Dakshinkar P
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 31089895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Goyal R; Sharma P; Bali R
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2021 Jun; 20(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 33927491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine, 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Ropivacaine During Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized
    Kaur K; Kaur T; Kapila S; Bhullar RS; Dhawan A; Singh B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2024 Jun; 23(3):538-544. PubMed ID: 38911429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery.
    Boonsiriseth K; Chaimanakarn S; Chewpreecha P; Nonpassopon N; Khanijou M; Ping B; Wongsirichat N
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2017 Mar; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 28879326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery.
    Senes AM; Calvo AM; Colombini-Ishikiriama BL; Gonçalves PZ; Dionísio TJ; Sant'ana E; Brozoski DT; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Santos CF
    J Dent Res; 2015 Sep; 94(9 Suppl):166S-73S. PubMed ID: 26202994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Tokuç B; Coşkunses FM
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Dec; 21(6):575-582. PubMed ID: 34909475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 2 and 4 % articaine in inferior alveolar nerve block for tooth extraction-a double-blinded randomized clinical trial.
    Kämmerer PW; Schneider D; Palarie V; Schiegnitz E; Daubländer M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):397-403. PubMed ID: 27020911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative split-mouth study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.
    Pellicer-Chover H; Cervera-Ballester J; Sanchis-Bielsa JM; Peñarrocha-Diago MA; Peñarrocha-Diago M; García-Mira B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2013 Apr; 5(2):e66-71. PubMed ID: 24455059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
    Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study.
    Brković B; Andrić M; Ćalasan D; Milić M; Stepić J; Vučetić M; Brajković D; Todorović L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):779-785. PubMed ID: 27114091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study.
    Beena S; Bhargava D; Gurjar P; Shrivastava S; Dalsingh V; Koneru G
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 31336212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kakade AN; Joshi SS; Naik CS; Mhatre BV; Ansari A
    J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2021 Oct; 21(5):451-459. PubMed ID: 34703894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.
    Olmedo-Gaya MV; Manzano-Moreno FJ; Muñoz-López JL; Vallecillo-Capilla MF; Reyes-Botella C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 29450738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.
    Kambalimath DH; Dolas RS; Kambalimath HV; Agrawal SM
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Mar; 12(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24431806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
    Bhargava D; Chakravorty N; Rethish E; Deshpande A
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Dec; 13(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 26225007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.