These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fast likelihood-based inference for latent count models using the saddlepoint approximation. Zhang W; Bravington MV; Fewster RM Biometrics; 2019 Sep; 75(3):723-733. PubMed ID: 30690707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification. Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncovering a latent multinomial: analysis of mark-recapture data with misidentification. Link WA; Yoshizaki J; Bailey LL; Pollock KH Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 19397581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks. McClintock BT Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A class of latent Markov models for capture-recapture data allowing for time, heterogeneity, and behavior effects. Bartolucci F; Pennoni F Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):568-78. PubMed ID: 17688509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heterogeneous capture-recapture models with covariates: a partial likelihood approach for closed populations. Stoklosa J; Hwang WH; Wu SH; Huggins R Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1659-65. PubMed ID: 21466530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating overdispersion in sparse multinomial data. Afroz F; Parry M; Fletcher D Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):834-842. PubMed ID: 31785150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the size of a closed population by modeling latent and observed heterogeneity. Bartolucci F; Forcina A Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38536746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hidden Markov models for extended batch data. Cowen LLE; Besbeas P; Morgan BJT; Schwarz CJ Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1321-1331. PubMed ID: 28482128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Capture-recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity. Thandrayen J; Wang Y Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 20669247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice. Schofield MR; Barker RJ; Link WA; Pavanato H Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3803-3817. PubMed ID: 36654190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial capture-recapture with multiple noninvasive marks: An application to camera-trapping data of the European wildcat ( Maronde L; McClintock BT; Breitenmoser U; Zimmermann F Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(24):13968-13979. PubMed ID: 33391695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum chi-square method for estimating population size in capture-recapture experiments. Zheng Y; Mao Y; Tsao M; Cowen LLE PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292622. PubMed ID: 37824521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial capture-mark-resight estimation of animal population density. Efford MG; Hunter CM Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):411-420. PubMed ID: 28834536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation in regression models for longitudinal binary data with outcome-dependent follow-up. Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG; Gelber R; Lipshultz S Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):469-85. PubMed ID: 16428260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semiparametric empirical likelihood inference for abundance from one-inflated capture-recapture data. Liu Y; Li P; Liu Y; Zhang R Biom J; 2022 Aug; 64(6):1040-1055. PubMed ID: 35429047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]