256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36322128)
41. Comparison of single and dual energy CT for stopping power determination in proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Taasti VT; Muren LP; Jensen K; Petersen JBB; Thygesen J; Tietze A; Grau C; Hansen DC
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 6():14-19. PubMed ID: 33458383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation.
Han D; Siebers JV; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):600. PubMed ID: 26745952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fast and effective single-scan dual-energy cone-beam CT reconstruction and decomposition denoising based on dual-energy vectorization.
Jiang X; Fang C; Hu P; Cui H; Zhu L; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):4843-4856. PubMed ID: 34289129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Image domain dual material decomposition for dual-energy CT using butterfly network.
Zhang W; Zhang H; Wang L; Wang X; Hu X; Cai A; Li L; Niu T; Yan B
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2037-2051. PubMed ID: 30883808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Proton-Dose Calculation with Scripting and Modified Hounsfield Units.
Kassaee A; Cheng C; Yin L; Zou W; Li T; Lin A; Swisher-McClure S; Lukens JN; Lustig RA; O'Reilly S; Dong L; Ms RH; Teo BK
Int J Part Ther; 2021; 8(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 34285936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Monte Carlo proton dose calculations using a radiotherapy specific dual-energy CT scanner for tissue segmentation and range assessment.
Almeida IP; Schyns LEJR; Vaniqui A; van der Heyden B; Dedes G; Resch AF; Kamp F; Zindler JD; Parodi K; Landry G; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(11):115008. PubMed ID: 29616662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Initial Validation of Proton Dose Calculations on SPR Images from DECT in Treatment Planning System.
Mossahebi S; Sabouri P; Chen H; Mundis M; O'Neil M; Maggi P; Polf JC
Int J Part Ther; 2020; 7(2):51-61. PubMed ID: 33274257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A simulation study on proton computed tomography (CT) stopping power accuracy using dual energy CT scans as benchmark.
Hansen DC; Seco J; Sørensen TS; Petersen JB; Wildberger JE; Verhaegen F; Landry G
Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26219959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A reconstruction approach for proton computed tomography by modeling the integral depth dose of the scanning proton pencil beam.
Chen X; Medrano M; Sun B; Hao Y; Reynoso FJ; Darafsheh A; Yang D; Zhang T; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2602-2620. PubMed ID: 35103331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Material elemental decomposition in dual and multi-energy CT via a sparsity-dictionary approach for proton stopping power ratio calculation.
Shen C; Li B; Chen L; Yang M; Lou Y; Jia X
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1491-1503. PubMed ID: 29405340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Quantitative imaging performance of MARS spectral photon-counting CT for radiotherapy.
Simard M; Panta RK; Bell ST; Butler APH; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3423-3434. PubMed ID: 32330301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improving the Accuracy of the Effective Atomic Number (EAN) and Relative Electron Density (RED) with Stoichiometric Calibration on PCD-CT Images.
Son K; Kim D; Lee S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36501922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Determination of the optimal range for virtual monoenergetic images in dual-energy CT based on physical quality parameters.
Fernandez-Velilla Cepria E; González-Ballester MÁ; Quera Jordana J; Pera O; Sanz Latiesas X; Foro Arnalot P; Membrive Conejo I; Rodriguez de Dios N; Reig Castillejo A; Algara Lopez M
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5085-5095. PubMed ID: 34287956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
