These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36324086)

  • 1. Dementia risk prediction in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a comparison of Cox regression and machine learning models.
    Wang M; Greenberg M; Forkert ND; Chekouo T; Afriyie G; Ismail Z; Smith EE; Sajobi TT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):284. PubMed ID: 36324086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival prediction models since liver transplantation - comparisons between Cox models and machine learning techniques.
    Kantidakis G; Putter H; Lancia C; Boer J; Braat AE; Fiocco M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):277. PubMed ID: 33198650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ESKD Risk Prediction Model in a Multicenter Chronic Kidney Disease Cohort in China: A Derivation, Validation, and Comparison Study.
    Hui M; Ma J; Yang H; Gao B; Wang F; Wang J; Lv J; Zhang L; Yang L; Zhao M
    J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36836039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dementia prediction in the general population using clinically accessible variables: a proof-of-concept study using machine learning. The AGES-Reykjavik study.
    Twait EL; Andaur Navarro CL; Gudnason V; Hu YH; Launer LJ; Geerlings MI
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Aug; 23(1):168. PubMed ID: 37641038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive performance of machine and statistical learning methods: Impact of data-generating processes on external validity in the "large N, small p" setting.
    Austin PC; Harrell FE; Steyerberg EW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1465-1483. PubMed ID: 33848231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
    Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Simulation Study to Compare the Predictive Performance of Survival Neural Networks with Cox Models for Clinical Trial Data.
    Kantidakis G; Biganzoli E; Putter H; Fiocco M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():2160322. PubMed ID: 34880930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efficacy of machine learning models
    Gao K; Wang Y; Cao H; Jia J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Jun; 43(6):952-963. PubMed ID: 37439167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival Analysis in Cognitively Normal Subjects and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Proportional Hazards Model with Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression.
    Khajehpiri B; Moghaddam HA; Forouzanfar M; Lashgari R; Ramos-Cejudo J; Osorio RS; Ardekani BA;
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2022; 85(2):837-850. PubMed ID: 34864679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and traditional regression-based statistical modeling for predicting hypertension incidence in a Canadian population.
    Chowdhury MZI; Leung AA; Walker RL; Sikdar KC; O'Beirne M; Quan H; Turin TC
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 36593280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
    Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Machine Learning Approach.
    Aschwanden D; Aichele S; Ghisletta P; Terracciano A; Kliegel M; Sutin AR; Brown J; Allemand M
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2020; 75(3):717-728. PubMed ID: 32333585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning approaches to studying the role of cognitive reserve in conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia.
    Facal D; Valladares-Rodriguez S; Lojo-Seoane C; Pereiro AX; Anido-Rifon L; Juncos-Rabadán O
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2019 Jul; 34(7):941-949. PubMed ID: 30854737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size and predictive performance of machine learning methods with survival data: A simulation study.
    Infante G; Miceli R; Ambrogi F
    Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(30):5657-5675. PubMed ID: 37947168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical models versus machine learning for competing risks: development and validation of prognostic models.
    Kantidakis G; Putter H; Litière S; Fiocco M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 36829145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical analyses and simulations showed that different machine and statistical learning methods had differing performance for predicting blood pressure.
    Austin PC; Harrell FE; Lee DS; Steyerberg EW
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9312. PubMed ID: 35660759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine-learning prediction of adolescent alcohol use: a cross-study, cross-cultural validation.
    Afzali MH; Sunderland M; Stewart S; Masse B; Seguin J; Newton N; Teesson M; Conrod P
    Addiction; 2019 Apr; 114(4):662-671. PubMed ID: 30461117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.