137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36324571)
1. Evaluation of tracer kinetic parameters in cervical cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as biomarkers in terms of biological relevance, diagnostic performance and inter-center variability.
Wang X; Li S; Lin X; Lu Y; Mao C; Ye Z; Li X; Koh TS; Liu J; Liu J; Ma X; Cheng J; Ning G; Yan Z; Hou Z
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():958219. PubMed ID: 36324571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the potential use of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters as radiomic features of cervical cancer.
Lu Y; Peng W; Song J; Chen T; Wang X; Hou Z; Yan Z; Koh TS
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5098-5109. PubMed ID: 31523829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endometrial carcinoma: use of tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative risk assessment.
Ye Z; Ning G; Li X; Koh TS; Chen H; Bai W; Qu H
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 35264244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge JF; Tanderup K; Duan C; Haack S; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Fokdal LU; Mohamed SM; Nielsen T
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1064-72. PubMed ID: 25034348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Distributed Parameter Model to Assessment of Glioma IDH Mutation Status by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Li Z; Zhao W; He B; Koh TS; Li Y; Zeng Y; Zhang Z; Zhang J; Hou Z
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2020; 2020():8843084. PubMed ID: 33299387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparative Study of Two-Compartment Exchange Models for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Characterizing Uterine Cervical Carcinoma.
Wang X; Lin W; Mao Y; Peng W; Song J; Lu Y; Zhao Y; Koh TS; Hou Z; Yan Z
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2019; 2019():3168416. PubMed ID: 31897081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dependence of DCE-MRI biomarker values on analysis algorithm.
Ng CS; Wei W; Bankson JA; Ravoori MK; Han L; Brammer DW; Klumpp S; Waterton JC; Jackson EF
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130168. PubMed ID: 26208254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-input two-compartment pharmacokinetic model of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yang JF; Zhao ZH; Zhang Y; Zhao L; Yang LM; Zhang MM; Wang BY; Wang T; Lu BC
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3652-62. PubMed ID: 27053857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations Between Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinically Relevant Histopathological Features in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis.
Surov A; Kim JY; Aiello M; Huang W; Yankeelov TE; Wienke A; Pech M
In Vivo; 2022; 36(1):398-408. PubMed ID: 34972741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voxelwise comparison of perfusion parameters estimated using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) computed tomography and DCE-magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kallehauge J; Nielsen T; Haack S; Peters DA; Mohamed S; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Hansen DC; Rasmussen F; Tanderup K; Pedersen EM
Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 24003852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer.
Li L; Wang K; Sun X; Wang K; Sun Y; Zhang G; Shen B
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Feb; 21():376-82. PubMed ID: 25640082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of tumor histology to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based physiological estimates.
Aref M; Chaudhari AR; Bailey KL; Aref S; Wiener EC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1279-93. PubMed ID: 18487033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the permeability, perfusion, and histogram characteristics in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with extended Tofts linear model.
Yin P; Xiong H; Liu Y; Sah SK; Zeng C; Wang J; Li Y; Hong N
Neurol India; 2018; 66(3):709-715. PubMed ID: 29766930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-input tracer kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in thoracic malignancies.
Lee SH; Rimner A; Deasy JO; Hunt MA; Tyagi N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):169-188. PubMed ID: 31602789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Kinetic Parameters as Prognostic Biomarkers for Prediction of Survival of Patient with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Comparative Study.
Lee SH; Hayano K; Zhu AX; Sahani DV; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2015 Nov; 22(11):1344-60. PubMed ID: 26211553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DCE-MRI of locally-advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Tofts analysis versus non-model-based analyses.
Lund KV; Simonsen TG; Kristensen GB; Rofstad EK
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 32293487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging perfusion characteristics in meningiomas treated with resection and adjuvant radiosurgery.
Chidambaram S; Pannullo SC; Roytman M; Pisapia DJ; Liechty B; Magge RS; Ramakrishna R; Stieg PE; Schwartz TH; Ivanidze J
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jun; 46(6):E10. PubMed ID: 31153141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Dispersion MRI for Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in a Multicenter Study.
Turco S; Lavini C; Heijmink S; Barentsz J; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W242-W251. PubMed ID: 30346837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in endometrial carcinoma identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence.
Haldorsen IS; Grüner R; Husby JA; Magnussen IJ; Werner HM; Salvesen OO; Bjørge L; Stefansson I; Akslen LA; Trovik J; Taxt T; Salvesen HB
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2916-25. PubMed ID: 23732687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Combined With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of Early Cervical Carcinoma: Correlations Between Multimodal Parameters and HIF-1α Expression.
Li X; Wu S; Li D; Yu T; Zhu H; Song Y; Meng L; Fan H; Xie L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):918-929. PubMed ID: 30648775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]