These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36325092)

  • 1. Keratome, a Better Alternative Scalpel to No. 15 Blade for Finer Incision-Randomized Control Trial.
    Mohan A; Rangwala M; Boringwala AQ
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 55(3):277-281. PubMed ID: 36325092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomy and Applications of the #15 Scalpel Blade and Its Variations.
    Chandra S; Podder I; Chatterjee M; Field L
    J Cutan Aesthet Surg; 2018; 11(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 30210210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. #15 Versus #15c Scalpel Blades for Skin Incisions: Accuracy With and Without Magnification.
    Iwanaga J; Kato T; Dumont AS; Tubbs RS
    Dermatol Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(6):791-796. PubMed ID: 33867473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scalpel safety and new scalpel blade remover.
    Hajipour B
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2011 Sep; 61(9):943-5. PubMed ID: 22360049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data of fracture effort in the deformation of the cutting surface of scalpel blades.
    Díaz-Caballero A; Tarón-Dunoyer A; Hernandez-Ligardo R
    Data Brief; 2019 Feb; 22():98-103. PubMed ID: 30581911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Iodine-Impregnated Incision Drapes on the Bacterial Contamination of Scalpel Blades in Joint Arthroplasty.
    Scheidt S; Walter S; Randau TM; Köpf US; Jordan MC; Hischebeth GTR
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2595-2600. PubMed ID: 32482473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing consistency of clear corneal incisions using a traditional diamond keratome and a newly designed diamond keratome.
    Swan RJ; Byrd JM; Bettis DI; Olson RJ
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1399-404. PubMed ID: 26261415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scalpel blade contamination and risk of postoperative surgical site infection following abdominal incisions in dogs.
    Lioce CG; Davis EC; Bennett JW; Townsend FI; Bloch CP
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Jul; 12(1):459. PubMed ID: 31345266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Inquiry on Airway Management by McCoy Blade with Elevated Tip and Miller Straight Blade with Paraglossal Technique: Relevance for Difficult Airway Management in Current Infectious Times.
    Vidhya S; Prakash N; Swain A; Kumar S; Shukla R
    Anesth Essays Res; 2021; 15(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 35422547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. After Incision, the Skin Knife Blade Is No More Contaminated Than a Fresh Knife Blade.
    Smith EB; Russo KA; Maltenfort MG; Sharkey PF; Rihn J
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Jan; 29(2):e98-e103. PubMed ID: 32568994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scalpel blade changer.
    Monadi Sefidan AR; Hajipour B
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014 Nov; 18(22):3420-4. PubMed ID: 25491617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in incision shape based on the keratome bevel.
    Akura J; Funakoshi T; Kadonosono K; Saito M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 May; 27(5):761-5. PubMed ID: 11377909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "hands together" method of nonsterile scalpel blade mounting and removal.
    Cornwall J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24150922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Analysis of Radiosurgery and Scalpel Blade Surgery in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Incisions: a Clinical Trial.
    Kalia V; Siddiqui N; Kalra G
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2018 Dec; 17(4):458-465. PubMed ID: 30344388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods.
    Chau JK; Dzigielewski P; Mlynarek A; Cote DW; Allen H; Harris JR; Seikaly HR
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Aug; 38(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 19755082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative cosmetic outcome of surgical incisions created by the PEAK Plasma Blade and a scalpel after cesarean section by Patient and Observer Assessment Scale (POSAS): A randomized double blind study.
    Ekin M; Dagdeviren H; Caypinar SS; Erdogan B; Ayag ME; Cengiz H; Yasar L; Helvacioglu Ç
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 29458906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healing comparison of porcine cutaneous incisions made with cold steel scalpel, standard electrosurgical blade, and a novel tissue dissector.
    Wu AY; Baldwin TJ; Patel BC; Clymer JW; Lewis RD
    Med Res Innov; 2017 Oct; 1(5):. PubMed ID: 33073169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Design and application of a retractable scalpel handle].
    Zhang G; Feng Q; Gao Y; Yu X; Ma H; Tao L
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jul; 32(7):869-870. PubMed ID: 32788026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of incision effects on upper lip height and thickness after maxillary surgically assisted expansion: a randomized clinical trial.
    Antonini F; da Costa DJ; de Moares RS; Rebellato NL; Klüppel LE; Parente EV
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1757.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23890785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects of 23-gauge and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy blade designs on incision architecture.
    Inoue M; Abulon DJ; Hirakata A
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2014; 8():2307-18. PubMed ID: 25429201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.