These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36325482)
1. Usefulness of phase gradients of otoacoustic emissions in auditory health screening: An exploration with swept tones. Wang X; Zhu M; He Y; Liu Z; Huang X; Pan H; Wang M; Chen S; Tao Y; Li G Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1018916. PubMed ID: 36325482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones. Chen S; Deng J; Bian L; Li G Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():104-14. PubMed ID: 24113114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns. Abdala C; Luo P; Guardia Y Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519889226. PubMed ID: 31789131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions induced by swept tones. Shixiong Chen ; Yanbing Jin ; Lisheng Xu ; Guanglin Li Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2733-6. PubMed ID: 26736857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing level equalized otoacoustic emissions acquired by swept-tones: intensity characteristics. Mihajloski T; Lachowska M; Bennett CL; Ozdamar O Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():818-21. PubMed ID: 22254436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss. Hoth S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 262(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15133692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates. Wilson US; Browning-Kamins J; Boothalingam S; Moleti A; Sisto R; Dhar S J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):1958-1968. PubMed ID: 32464079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz. Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in-situ calibration method and the effects on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. Chen S; Zhang H; Wang L; Li G Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Jul; 13():95. PubMed ID: 25001486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears. Abdala C; Kalluri R J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):812. PubMed ID: 28863614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans. Dewey JB; Dhar S J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance. Go NA; Stamper GC; Johnson TA Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a dynamic tracking filter to extract distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked with swept-tone signals. Deng J; Chen S; Zeng X; Li G IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Jul; 18(4):1186-95. PubMed ID: 24132032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]