These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36326619)

  • 1. Probing Methyl Group Dynamics in Proteins by NMR Cross-Correlated Dipolar Relaxation and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Ali AAAI; Hoffmann F; Schäfer LV; Mulder FAA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Dec; 18(12):7722-7732. PubMed ID: 36326619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting NMR relaxation of proteins from molecular dynamics simulations with accurate methyl rotation barriers.
    Hoffmann F; Mulder FAA; Schäfer LV
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Feb; 152(8):084102. PubMed ID: 32113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Narrowing the gap between experimental and computational determination of methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Hoffmann F; Xue M; Schäfer LV; Mulder FAA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 Oct; 20(38):24577-24590. PubMed ID: 30226234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probing protein side chain dynamics via 13C NMR relaxation.
    Yang D
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Apr; 18(4):380-95. PubMed ID: 21222636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unraveling motion in proteins by combining NMR relaxometry and molecular dynamics simulations: A case study on ubiquitin.
    Champion C; Lehner M; Smith AA; Ferrage F; Bolik-Coulon N; Riniker S
    J Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 160(10):. PubMed ID: 38465679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate Methyl Group Dynamics in Protein Simulations with AMBER Force Fields.
    Hoffmann F; Mulder FAA; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(19):5038-5048. PubMed ID: 29695158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observation of Sub-Microsecond Protein Methyl-Side Chain Dynamics by Nanoparticle-Assisted NMR Spin Relaxation.
    Xiang X; Hansen AL; Yu L; Jameson G; Bruschweiler-Li L; Yuan C; Brüschweiler R
    J Am Chem Soc; 2021 Sep; 143(34):13593-13604. PubMed ID: 34428032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does it really move? Recent progress in the investigation of protein nanosecond dynamics by NMR and simulation.
    Stenström O; Champion C; Lehner M; Bouvignies G; Riniker S; Ferrage F
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2022 Dec; 77():102459. PubMed ID: 36148743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting Force Field Parameters to NMR Relaxation Data.
    Kümmerer F; Orioli S; Lindorff-Larsen K
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(12):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 37276045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explicit models of motions to analyze NMR relaxation data in proteins.
    Bolik-Coulon N; Ferrage F
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Sep; 157(12):125102. PubMed ID: 36182415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General order parameter based correlation analysis of protein backbone motions between experimental NMR relaxation measurements and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu Q; Shi C; Yu L; Zhang L; Xiong Y; Tian C
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Feb; 457(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 25600810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data.
    Huang J; MacKerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2013 Sep; 34(25):2135-45. PubMed ID: 23832629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining Molecular and Spin Dynamics Simulations with Solid-State NMR: A Case Study of Amphiphilic Lysine-Leucine Repeat Peptide Aggregates.
    Emani PS; Yimer YY; Davidowski SK; Gebhart RN; Ferreira HE; Kuprov I; Pfaendtner J; Drobny GP
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Dec; 123(51):10915-10929. PubMed ID: 31769684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing side-chain dynamics in the proteasome by relaxation violated coherence transfer NMR spectroscopy.
    Tugarinov V; Sprangers R; Kay LE
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Feb; 129(6):1743-50. PubMed ID: 17249677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a predictive understanding of slow methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Long D; Li DW; Walter KF; Griesinger C; Brüschweiler R
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21843482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.
    Trbovic N; Kim B; Friesner RA; Palmer AG
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(2):684-94. PubMed ID: 17975832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased rigidity of eglin c at acidic pH: evidence from NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations.
    Hu H; Clarkson MW; Hermans J; Lee AL
    Biochemistry; 2003 Dec; 42(47):13856-68. PubMed ID: 14636053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins.
    Case DA
    Acc Chem Res; 2002 Jun; 35(6):325-31. PubMed ID: 12069616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probing side-chain dynamics in proteins by the measurement of nine deuterium relaxation rates per methyl group.
    Liao X; Long D; Li DW; Brüschweiler R; Tugarinov V
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Jan; 116(1):606-20. PubMed ID: 22098066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization for the Study of Hydration Dynamics, Explained.
    Franck JM; Han S
    Methods Enzymol; 2019; 615():131-175. PubMed ID: 30638529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.