These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36326634)

  • 1. Estimating the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis via out-of-sample prediction errors.
    Haslbeck JMB; van Bork R
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 36326634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
    Vrieze SI
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers.
    Bulteel K; Wilderjans TF; Tuerlinckx F; Ceulemans E
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):782-91. PubMed ID: 23307573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist model selection methods for factor analysis models.
    Lu ZH; Chow SM; Loken E
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):361-381. PubMed ID: 28594228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Huang PH
    Psychometrika; 2017 Jun; 82(2):407-426. PubMed ID: 28447310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.
    Altinisik Y; Van Lissa CJ; Hoijtink H; Oldehinkel AJ; Kuiper RM
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):599-621. PubMed ID: 34855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion in Selecting Partition Models and Mixture Models.
    Liu Q; Charleston MA; Richards SA; Holland BR
    Syst Biol; 2023 May; 72(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 36575813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computationally efficient and robust method to estimate exploratory factor analysis models with correlated residuals.
    Zhang G; Lee D
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39311819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using cross-validation methods to select time series models: Promises and pitfalls.
    Liu S; Zhou DJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; 77(2):337-355. PubMed ID: 38059390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heywood you go away! Examining causes, effects, and treatments for Heywood cases in exploratory factor analysis.
    Cooperman AW; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):156-176. PubMed ID: 34197140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Samples and Missing Data.
    McNeish D
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(6):637-652. PubMed ID: 27929657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Three Prediction Models for Predicting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China.
    Teng Y; Jian Y; Chen X; Li Y; Han B; Wang L
    Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2023; 18():2961-2969. PubMed ID: 38107597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: A simulation and tutorial.
    Golino H; Shi D; Christensen AP; Garrido LE; Nieto MD; Sadana R; Thiyagarajan JA; Martinez-Molina A
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):292-320. PubMed ID: 32191105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty.
    Alfaro ME; Huelsenbeck JP
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16507526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonparametric mixed effects models for unequally sampled noisy curves.
    Rice JA; Wu CO
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 11252607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effective sample size in Bayesian information criterion for level-specific fixed and random-effect selection in a two-level nested model.
    Cho SJ; Wu H; Naveiras M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; 77(2):289-315. PubMed ID: 38591555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully and partially exploratory factor analysis with bi-level Bayesian regularization.
    Chen J
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2125-2142. PubMed ID: 35830000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models.
    Markon KE; Krueger RF
    Behav Genet; 2004 Nov; 34(6):593-610. PubMed ID: 15520516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information Criteria for Comparing Partition Schemes.
    Seo TK; Thorne JL
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jul; 67(4):616-632. PubMed ID: 29309694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical Kaiser criterion.
    Braeken J; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 27031883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.