125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36326994)
21. A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications.
Eck VG; Donders WP; Sturdy J; Feinberg J; Delhaas T; Hellevik LR; Huberts W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 32(8):. PubMed ID: 26475178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mathematical modeling of cardiovascular system dynamics using a lumped parameter method.
Shim EB; Sah JY; Youn CH
Jpn J Physiol; 2004 Dec; 54(6):545-53. PubMed ID: 15760487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reduced-Order Unscented Kalman Filter With Observations in the Frequency Domain: Application to Computational Hemodynamics.
Muller LO; Caiazzo A; Blanco PJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 66(5):1269-1276. PubMed ID: 30273122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Practical identifiability and uncertainty quantification of a pulsatile cardiovascular model.
Marquis AD; Arnold A; Dean-Bernhoft C; Carlson BE; Olufsen MS
Math Biosci; 2018 Oct; 304():9-24. PubMed ID: 30017910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Finite state machine implementation for left ventricle modeling and control.
King JM; Bergeron CA; Taylor CE
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Jan; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 30700298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Global sensitivity analysis of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement with a stochastic computational model of the hepatic circulation.
Wang T; Liang F; Zhou Z; Qi X
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 97():124-136. PubMed ID: 29723809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A patient-specific lumped-parameter model of coronary circulation.
Duanmu Z; Yin M; Fan X; Yang X; Luo X
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):874. PubMed ID: 29343785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Measurement of the portal blood flow in man by continuous local thermodilution method: II. Portal hemodynamics before and after hepatectomy].
Yamazaki O; Sakai K; Kinoshita H; Hirohashi K; Tsuji Y; Suzuki N; Inoue T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 87(7):743-53. PubMed ID: 3018473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A highly parallel simulation of patient-specific hepatic flows.
Lin Z; Chen R; Gao B; Qin S; Wu B; Liu J; Cai XC
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Jun; 37(6):e3451. PubMed ID: 33609008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling the impact of partial hepatectomy on the hepatic hemodynamics using a rat model.
Debbaut C; De Wilde D; Casteleyn C; Cornillie P; Van Loo D; Van Hoorebeke L; Monbaliu D; Fan YD; Segers P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Dec; 59(12):3293-303. PubMed ID: 22588575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Uncertainty quantification in virtual surgery hemodynamics predictions for single ventricle palliation.
Schiavazzi DE; Arbia G; Baker C; Hlavacek AM; Hsia TY; Marsden AL; Vignon-Clementel IE;
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 Mar; 32(3):e02737. PubMed ID: 26217878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A numerical method of reduced complexity for simulating vascular hemodynamics using coupled 0D lumped and 1D wave propagation models.
Kroon W; Huberts W; Bosboom M; van de Vosse F
Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():156094. PubMed ID: 22654957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling individual differences in cardiovascular response to gravitational stress using a sensitivity analysis.
Whittle RS; Diaz-Artiles A
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2021 Jun; 130(6):1983-2001. PubMed ID: 33914657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On-line parameter identification of the lumped arterial system model: A simulation study.
Huang F; Ying S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236012. PubMed ID: 32649706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Developmental artificial neural network model to evaluate the preoperative safe limit of future liver remnant volume for HCC combined with clinically significant portal hypertension.
Lu HZ; Mai RY; Wang XB; Chen J; Bai T; Ma L; Xiang BD; Cheng SQ; Guo WX; Li LQ; Ye JZ
Future Oncol; 2022 Jul; 18(21):2683-2694. PubMed ID: 35699041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications.
Renardy M; Joslyn LR; Millar JA; Kirschner DE
Math Biosci; 2021 Jul; 337():108593. PubMed ID: 33865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automated model calibration with parallel MCMC: Applications for a cardiovascular system model.
Argus F; Zhao D; Babarenda Gamage TP; Nash MP; Maso Talou GD
Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1018134. PubMed ID: 36439250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Numerical modeling of heart valves using resistive Eulerian surfaces.
Laadhari A; Quarteroni A
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 32(5):. PubMed ID: 26255787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A numerical model applied to the simulation of cardiovascular hemodynamics and operating condition of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.
Liu H; Liu S; Ma X; Zhang Y
Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(6):7519-7543. PubMed ID: 33378908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modeling the hepatic arterial flow in living liver donor after left hepatectomy and postoperative boundary condition exploration.
Ma R; Hunter P; Cousins W; Ho H; Bartlett A; Safaei S
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Mar; 36(3):e3268. PubMed ID: 31692300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
