These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36328114)

  • 41. Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.
    Bangalore S; Toklu B; Stone GW
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 121(5):529-536. PubMed ID: 29304995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome Between Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Infarct-Related Artery-Only Revascularization for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lee JM; Rhee TM; Kim HK; Hwang D; Lee SH; Choi KH; Kim J; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi JH; Choi SH; Koo BK; Chae SC; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Kim JH; Kim HS; Gwon HC; Jeong MH; Hahn JY;
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Dec; 8(24):e013870. PubMed ID: 31818215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Medical Therapy for Coronary Lesions With Positive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) but Preserved Pressure-Bounded Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR): A Substudy of the Randomized Compare-Acute Trial.
    Haeck JDE; Van't Veer M; Zimmermann FM; Neumann FJ; Triantafyllis AS; Sjauw KD; Abdel-Wahab M; Omerovic E; Boxma-de Klerk BM; Pijls NHJ; Richardt G; Tonino PAL; Johnson NP; Smits PC
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 33(7):E557-E564. PubMed ID: 34089578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Vessel fractional flow reserve-based non-culprit lesion reclassification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Impact on treatment strategy and clinical outcome (FAST STEMI I study).
    Groenland FTW; Huang J; Scoccia A; Neleman T; Ziedses Des Plantes AC; Nuis RJ; den Dekker WK; Wilschut JM; Diletti R; Kardys I; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 373():33-38. PubMed ID: 36436683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prognostic Value of Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the FAME 3 Trial.
    Piroth Z; Otsuki H; Zimmermann FM; Ferenci T; Keulards DCJ; Yeung AC; Pijls NHJ; De Bruyne B; Fearon WF
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 15(11):884-891. PubMed ID: 36121706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score After Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS.
    Kobayashi Y; Lønborg J; Jong A; Nishi T; De Bruyne B; Høfsten DE; Kelbæk H; Layland J; Nam CW; Pijls NHJ; Tonino PAL; Warnøe J; Oldroyd KG; Berry C; Engstrøm T; Fearon WF;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 72(12):1321-1329. PubMed ID: 30213322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Cornary Intervention for Patients with Angina Pectoris.
    Shinohara H; Kodera S; Kiyosue A; Ando J; Morita H; Komuro I
    Int Heart J; 2020 Nov; 61(6):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 33191337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Coronary CT-based FFR in patients with acute myocardial infarction might predict follow-up invasive FFR: The XPECT-MI study.
    Boussoussou M; Édes IF; Nowotta F; Vattay B; Vecsey-Nagy M; Drobni Z; Simon J; Kolossváry M; Németh B; Jermendy ÁL; Becker D; Leipsic J; Rogers C; Collinsworth A; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; Szilveszter B
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 37244776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Complete vs Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI With Multivessel Disease: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Bainey KR; Welsh RC; Toklu B; Bangalore S
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1542-1551. PubMed ID: 27378594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography Guided Complete Revascularization in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Hyasat K; Hasche E; Almafragy H; Chiha J; Asrress K; Liou K
    Angiology; 2024 Feb; ():33197241232441. PubMed ID: 38353547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease.
    Di Gioia G; Soto Flores N; Franco D; Colaiori I; Sonck J; Gigante C; Kodeboina M; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Van Praet F; Casselman F; Degriek I; Stockman B; Barbato E; Collet C; De Bruyne B
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009157. PubMed ID: 33040579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Meta-Analysis of Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.
    Shah R; Nayyar M; Le FK; Labroo A; Davis DA; Brilakis ES; Kandzari DE
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 129():19-24. PubMed ID: 32540166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
    Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Complete revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ST elevation acute coronary syndrome - for whom and when? A comprehensive review.
    Spacek M; Vacha J; Precek J; Hutyra M; Nykl R; Sluka M; Taborsky M
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2023 Mar; 167(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 35703363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Network meta-analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization.
    Verardi R; Fioravanti F; Barbero U; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Rinaldi M; Escaned J; D'Ascenzo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 30136420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.