241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36328286)
1. Field application of biodegradable microplastics has no significant effect on plant and soil health in the short term.
Chu J; Zhou J; Wang Y; Jones DL; Ge J; Yang Y; Brown RW; Zang H; Zeng Z
Environ Pollut; 2023 Jan; 316(Pt 1):120556. PubMed ID: 36328286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The long-term uncertainty of biodegradable mulch film residues and associated microplastics pollution on plant-soil health.
Zhou J; Jia R; Brown RW; Yang Y; Zeng Z; Jones DL; Zang H
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Jan; 442():130055. PubMed ID: 36303333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of polylactic acid microplastics on soil properties, soil microbials and plant growth.
Liu R; Liang J; Yang Y; Jiang H; Tian X
Chemosphere; 2023 Jul; 329():138504. PubMed ID: 37011822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biodegradable microplastics pose greater risks than conventional microplastics to soil properties, microbial community and plant growth, especially under flooded conditions.
Wang J; Jia M; Zhang L; Li X; Zhang X; Wang Z
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 931():172949. PubMed ID: 38703848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microplastics in soil ecosystems: soil fauna responses to field applications of conventional and biodegradable microplastics.
Huang M; Zhu Y; Chen Y; Liang Y
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Jan; 441():129943. PubMed ID: 36099741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are biodegradable mulch films a sustainable solution to microplastic mulch film pollution? A biogeochemical perspective.
Huang F; Zhang Q; Wang L; Zhang C; Zhang Y
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Oct; 459():132024. PubMed ID: 37572603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unveiling the detrimental effects of polylactic acid microplastics on rice seedlings and soil health.
Irshad MK; Kang MW; Aqeel M; Javed W; Noman A; Khalid N; Lee SS
Chemosphere; 2024 May; 355():141771. PubMed ID: 38522668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biodegradable PBAT microplastics adversely affect pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) growth and the rhizosphere ecology: Focusing on rhizosphere microbial community composition, element metabolic potential, and root exudates.
Han Y; Teng Y; Wang X; Wen D; Gao P; Yan D; Yang N
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():169048. PubMed ID: 38061654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrepant soil microbial community and C cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics.
Yu H; Liu X; Qiu X; Sun T; Cao J; Lv M; Sui Z; Wang Z; Jiao S; Xu Y; Wang F
J Hazard Mater; 2024 May; 470():134176. PubMed ID: 38569347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integrated microbiota and multi-omics analysis reveal the differential responses of earthworm to conventional and biodegradable microplastics in soil under biogas slurry irrigation.
Zhao Y; Jia H; Deng H; Ge C; Xing W; Yu H; Li J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 907():168191. PubMed ID: 37907108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of polylactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT) biodegradable microplastics on the abundance and diversity of denitrifying and anammox bacteria in freshwater sediment.
Nie Z; Wang L; Lin Y; Xiao N; Zhao J; Wan X; Hu J
Environ Pollut; 2022 Dec; 315():120343. PubMed ID: 36208824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response of peanut plant and soil N-fixing bacterial communities to conventional and biodegradable microplastics.
Wang Q; Feng X; Liu Y; Li W; Cui W; Sun Y; Zhang S; Wang F; Xing B
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Oct; 459():132142. PubMed ID: 37515992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growth to soil contaminated with microplastics.
Meng F; Yang X; Riksen M; Xu M; Geissen V
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 2):142516. PubMed ID: 33045612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Different effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics on the amelioration process of cadmium-contaminated soil.
Li G; Cai L; Liu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164589. PubMed ID: 37271401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of microplastic type on growth and physiology of soil crops: Implications for farmland yield and food quality.
Zhou W; Wang Q; Wei Z; Jiang J; Deng J
Environ Pollut; 2023 Jun; 326():121512. PubMed ID: 36967010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The plastisphere of biodegradable and conventional microplastics from residues exhibit distinct microbial structure, network and function in plastic-mulching farmland.
Li K; Jia W; Xu L; Zhang M; Huang Y
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Jan; 442():130011. PubMed ID: 36155295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mixing effect of polylactic acid microplastic and straw residue on soil property and ecological function.
Chen H; Wang Y; Sun X; Peng Y; Xiao L
Chemosphere; 2020 Mar; 243():125271. PubMed ID: 31760289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamics of macroplastics and microplastics formed by biodegradable mulch film in an agricultural field.
Li S; Ding F; Flury M; Wang J
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Oct; 894():164674. PubMed ID: 37301399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microplastics alter the equilibrium of plant-soil-microbial system: A meta-analysis.
Jia Y; Cheng Z; Peng Y; Yang G
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Mar; 272():116082. PubMed ID: 38335576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review on the occurrence and influence of biodegradable microplastics in soil ecosystems: Are biodegradable plastics substitute or threat?
Fan P; Yu H; Xi B; Tan W
Environ Int; 2022 May; 163():107244. PubMed ID: 35436719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
