186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36329212)
1. Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Ding Y; Zhang X; Qiu J; Li C; Hua K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 36329212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy.
Klapdor R; Hertel H; Delebinski L; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jan; 305(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 34291339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R).
Kim SI; Nam SH; Hwangbo S; Kim Y; Cho HW; Suh DH; Song JY; Kim JW; Choi CH; Kim DY; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 173():88-97. PubMed ID: 37105062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
Chacon E; Manzour N; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Gil Moreno A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Boria F; Alcazar JL; Chiva L; ;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 35039455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the FIGO 2018 staging system of cervical cancer: Retrospective analysis of FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumor under 2 cm.
Takahashi M; Sakai K; Iwasa N; Wada M; Hino M; Kurahashi T; Ueno M; Nakagawa H
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 May; 47(5):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 33611822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.
Aubrey C; Pond GR; Helpman L; Vicus D; Elit L; Plante M; Lau S; Kwon JS; Altman AD; Willows K; Feigenberg T; Sabourin J; Samouelian V; Bernard L; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Piedimonte S; Teo-Fortin LA; Kim SR; Sadeq N; Jang JH; Shamiya S; Nelson G
Curr Oncol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 36826114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A).
Kato T; Takashima A; Kasamatsu T; Nakamura K; Mizusawa J; Nakanishi T; Takeshima N; Kamiura S; Onda T; Sumi T; Takano M; Nakai H; Saito T; Fujiwara K; Yokoyama M; Itamochi H; Takehara K; Yokota H; Mizunoe T; Takeda S; Sonoda K; Shiozawa T; Kawabata T; Honma S; Fukuda H; Yaegashi N; Yoshikawa H; Konishi I; Kamura T;
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25662625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
Bizzarri N; Pedone Anchora L; Kucukmetin A; Ratnavelu N; Korompelis P; Carbone V; Fedele C; Bruno M; Vizzielli G; Gallotta V; De Vincenzo R; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Ferrandina G; Scambia G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):3585-3594. PubMed ID: 33620615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
