131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36329880)
21. A novel partial volume effects correction technique integrating deconvolution associated with denoising within an iterative PET image reconstruction.
Merlin T; Visvikis D; Fernandez P; Lamare F
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):804-19. PubMed ID: 25652494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Parametric blind deconvolution: a robust method for the simultaneous estimation of image and blur.
Markham J; Conchello JA
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Oct; 16(10):2377-91. PubMed ID: 10517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Blind Deconvolution With Model Discrepancies.
Kotera J; Smidl V; Sroubek F
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 May; 26(5):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 28278468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Noise suppression of point spread functions and its influence on deconvolution of three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy image sets.
Lai X; Lin Z; Ward ES; Ober RJ
J Microsc; 2005 Jan; 217(Pt 1):93-108. PubMed ID: 15655067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Non-Local Superpatch-Based Algorithm Exploiting Low Rank Prior for Restoration of Hyperspectral Images.
Sarkar S; Sahay RR
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():6335-6348. PubMed ID: 34232876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Image deconvolution for confocal laser scanning microscopy using constrained total variation with a gradient field.
He T; Sun Y; Qi J; Hu J; Huang H
Appl Opt; 2019 May; 58(14):3754-3766. PubMed ID: 31158185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modeling Point Spread Function in Fluorescence Microscopy With a Sparse Gaussian Mixture: Tradeoff Between Accuracy and Efficiency.
Samuylov DK; Purwar P; Szekely G; Paul G
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Aug; 28(8):3688-3702. PubMed ID: 30762548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved deconvolution of very weak confocal signals.
Day KJ; La Rivière PJ; Chandler T; Bindokas VP; Ferrier NJ; Glick BS
F1000Res; 2017; 6():787. PubMed ID: 28868135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multiphoton fluorescent images with a spatially varying background signal: a ML deconvolution method.
Crivaro M; Enjieu-Kadji H; Hatanaka R; Nakauchi S; Bosch J; Judin J; Riera J; Kawashima R
J Microsc; 2011 Jun; 242(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 21143230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A dictionary learning approach for Poisson image deblurring.
Ma L; Moisan L; Yu J; Zeng T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1277-89. PubMed ID: 23549888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of statistical prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): II. Application to dose reduction.
Lauzier PT; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021902. PubMed ID: 23387750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An algorithm for PET tumor volume and activity quantification: without specifying camera's point spread function (PSF).
Bhatt R; Adjouadi M; Goryawala M; Gulec SA; McGoron AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4187-202. PubMed ID: 22830752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Parametric blind deconvolution for confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Pankajakshan P; Zhang B; Blanc-Feraud L; Kam Z; Olivo-Marin JC; Zerubia J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():6532-5. PubMed ID: 18003522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-fidelity deconvolution for acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscopy enabled by convolutional neural networks.
Feng F; Liang S; Luo J; Chen SL
Photoacoustics; 2022 Jun; 26():100360. PubMed ID: 35574187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization model for multiplicative noise and blur removal based on Gaussian curvature regularization.
Ren F; Zhou RR
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 May; 35(5):798-812. PubMed ID: 29726493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Parallel proximal algorithm for image restoration using hybrid regularization.
Pustelnik N; Chaux C; Pesquet JC
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Sep; 20(9):2450-62. PubMed ID: 21421440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A dual path programmable array microscope (PAM): simultaneous acquisition of conjugate and non-conjugate images.
Heintzmann R; Hanley QS; Arndt-Jovin D; Jovin TM
J Microsc; 2001 Nov; 204(Pt 2):119-35. PubMed ID: 11737545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Richardson-Lucy deconvolution as a general tool for combining images with complementary strengths.
Ingaramo M; York AG; Hoogendoorn E; Postma M; Shroff H; Patterson GH
Chemphyschem; 2014 Mar; 15(4):794-800. PubMed ID: 24436314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Image reconstruction for large FOV Airy beam light-sheet microscopy by a 3D deconvolution approach.
Qin S
Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(10):2804-2807. PubMed ID: 32412471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Image adaptive point-spread function estimation and deconvolution for in vivo confocal microscopy.
Von Tiedemann M; Fridberger A; Ulfendahl M; Tomo I; Boutet de Monvel J
Microsc Res Tech; 2006 Jan; 69(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 16416409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
