155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36330455)
1. Application of O-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon-Based Logistic Regression Analysis Model in the Diagnosis of Solid Component-Containing Ovarian Malignancies.
Luo H; Lin Z; Wu L; Wang Y; Ning H; Feng Y; Cheng Y; Wen X; Liu X
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7187334. PubMed ID: 36330455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Savelli L; Fischerova D; Froyman W; Wynants L; Van Holsbeke C; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kaijser J; Czekierdowski A; Guerriero S; Fruscio R; Leone FPG; Rossi A; Landolfo C; Vergote I; Bourne T; Valentin L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):424-437. PubMed ID: 26800772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ferrazzi E; Ameye L; Konstantinovic ML; Van Calster B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(34):8794-801. PubMed ID: 16314639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.
Li Y; Shao G; Wu M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Shao C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Feb; 50(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 37990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to improve O-RADS MRI score for rating adnexal masses with cystic component?
Assouline V; Dabi Y; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Stojanovic S; Millet I; Reinhold C; Bazot M; Thomassin-Naggara I;
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5943-5953. PubMed ID: 35332409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.
Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.
Gong LP; Li XY; Wu YN; Dong S; Zhang S; Feng YN; Lv YE; Guo XJ; Peng YQ; Du XS; Tian JW; Sun CX; Sun LT
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 36945000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a model that includes two ultrasound parameters and the plasma D-dimer level for predicting malignancy in adnexal masses: an observational study.
Stukan M; Badocha M; Ratajczak K
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):564. PubMed ID: 31185938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of CA125/CEA ratio and ultrasound parameters in identifying metastases to the ovaries in patients with multilocular and multilocular-solid ovarian masses.
Moro F; Pasciuto T; Djokovic D; Di Legge A; Granato V; Moruzzi MC; Mancari R; Zannoni GF; Fischerova D; Franchi D; Scambia G; Testa AC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 29978587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, IOTA simple rules and O-RADS for assessing the malignant risk of sonographically appearing solid ovarian masses.
Lu B; Liu C; Qi J; He W; Shi T; Zhu Y; Huang B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 52(4):102564. PubMed ID: 36868504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
