These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36331162)

  • 41. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient.
    Takimoto G; Miki T; Kagami M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Sep; 72(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 17573086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prey vulnerability limits top-down control and alters reciprocal feedbacks in a subsidized model food web.
    Atlas WI; Palen WJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85830. PubMed ID: 24465732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Negative effect of turbidity on prey capture for both visual and non-visual aquatic predators.
    Ortega JCG; Figueiredo BRS; da Graça WJ; Agostinho AA; Bini LM
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Nov; 89(11):2427-2439. PubMed ID: 32860423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mechanisms of trophic niche compression: Evidence from landscape disturbance.
    Burdon FJ; McIntosh AR; Harding JS
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Mar; 89(3):730-744. PubMed ID: 31691281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rethinking trophic niches: Speed and body mass colimit prey space of mammalian predators.
    Hirt MR; Tucker M; Müller T; Rosenbaum B; Brose U
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jul; 10(14):7094-7105. PubMed ID: 32760514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Consequences of size structure in the prey for predator-prey dynamics: the composite functional response.
    Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18284478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system.
    Sinclair AR; Mduma S; Brashares JS
    Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6955):288-90. PubMed ID: 13679915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Nanoparticles transported from aquatic to terrestrial ecosystems via emerging aquatic insects compromise subsidy quality.
    Bundschuh M; Englert D; Rosenfeldt RR; Bundschuh R; Feckler A; Lüderwald S; Seitz F; Zubrod JP; Schulz R
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15676. PubMed ID: 31666603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Revealing species-specific trophic links in soil food webs: molecular identification of scarab predators.
    Juen A; Traugott M
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Apr; 16(7):1545-57. PubMed ID: 17391275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments.
    Meissner K; Muotka T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):421-33. PubMed ID: 16637995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability.
    Otto SB; Rall BC; Brose U
    Nature; 2007 Dec; 450(7173):1226-9. PubMed ID: 18097408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Latitudinal gradients in biotic niche breadth vary across ecosystem types.
    Cirtwill AR; Stouffer DB; Romanuk TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 282(1819):. PubMed ID: 26559955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Do intraspecific or interspecific interactions determine responses to predators feeding on a shared size-structured prey community?
    ten Brink H; Mazumdar AK; Huddart J; Persson L; Cameron TC
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 25314614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes.
    Brose U; Ehnes RB; Rall BC; Vucic-Pestic O; Berlow EL; Scheu S
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Sep; 77(5):1072-8. PubMed ID: 18540967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs.
    Sherr EB; Sherr BF
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2002 Aug; 81(1-4):293-308. PubMed ID: 12448728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Coupling of canopy and understory food webs by ground-dwelling predators.
    Pringle RM; Fox-Dobbs K
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Dec; 11(12):1328-37. PubMed ID: 19046361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Geometric factors influencing the diet of vertebrate predators in marine and terrestrial environments.
    Carbone C; Codron D; Scofield C; Clauss M; Bielby J
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Dec; 17(12):1553-9. PubMed ID: 25265992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intervality and coherence in complex networks.
    Domínguez-García V; Johnson S; Muñoz MA
    Chaos; 2016 Jun; 26(6):065308. PubMed ID: 27368797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ecosystem function in predator-prey food webs-confronting dynamic models with empirical data.
    Curtsdotter A; Banks HT; Banks JE; Jonsson M; Jonsson T; Laubmeier AN; Traugott M; Bommarco R
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Feb; 88(2):196-210. PubMed ID: 30079547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evolution of prudent predation in complex food webs.
    Gutiérrez Al-Khudhairy OU; Rossberg AG
    Ecol Lett; 2022 May; 25(5):1055-1074. PubMed ID: 35229972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.