These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36332194)

  • 1. A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet.
    Ramamurthy K; Varikuti AR; Gupta B; Aswani N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 36332194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
    Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographic pathological grading of prostate cancer using automatic region-based Gleason grading network.
    Lu X; Zhang S; Liu Z; Liu S; Huang J; Kong G; Li M; Liang Y; Cui Y; Yang C; Zhao S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2022 Dec; 102():102125. PubMed ID: 36257091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hybrid Unified Deep Learning Network for Highly Precise Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer.
    Poojitha UP; Lal Sharma S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():899-903. PubMed ID: 31946039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning.
    Arvaniti E; Fricker KS; Moret M; Rupp N; Hermanns T; Fankhauser C; Wey N; Wild PJ; Rüschoff JH; Claassen M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12054. PubMed ID: 30104757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epithelium segmentation and automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer via deep learning in label-free multiphoton microscopic images.
    Yang Q; Xu Z; Liao C; Cai J; Huang Y; Chen H; Tao X; Huang Z; Chen J; Dong J; Zhu X
    J Biophotonics; 2020 Feb; 13(2):e201900203. PubMed ID: 31710780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer using transfer learning from general-purpose deep-learning networks.
    Şerbănescu MS; Manea NC; Streba L; Belciug S; Pleşea IE; Pirici I; Bungărdean RM; Pleşea RM
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2020; 61(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 32747906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis.
    Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carcino-Net: A Deep Learning Framework for Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies.
    Lokhande A; Bonthu S; Singhal N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1380-1383. PubMed ID: 33018246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
    Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using multi-label ensemble CNN classifiers to mitigate labelling inconsistencies in patch-level Gleason grading.
    Butt MA; Kaleem MF; Bilal M; Hanif MS
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0304847. PubMed ID: 38968206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of the inter-observer variability on Gleason grading against Deep Learning-based approaches for prostate cancer.
    Marrón-Esquivel JM; Duran-Lopez L; Linares-Barranco A; Dominguez-Morales JP
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jun; 159():106856. PubMed ID: 37075600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
    Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
    Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.