138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36333258)
1. Effect of endoscopic craniopharyngioma resection with pituitary-stalk preservation on symptom relief and surgical complications.
Huang K; Liu Y; Zhou L
Asian J Surg; 2023 Apr; 46(4):1869-1870. PubMed ID: 36333258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Surgical Approaches to Craniopharyngiomas].
Goto T
No Shinkei Geka; 2023 Jul; 51(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 37491064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor.
Dho YS; Kim YH; Se YB; Han DH; Kim JH; Park CK; Wang KC; Kim DG
J Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 129(3):611-619. PubMed ID: 28960155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triphasic response after endoscopic craniopharyngioma resection and its dependency on infundibular preservation or sacrifice.
Lopez DC; Almeida JP; Momin AA; Andrade EJ; Soni P; Yogi-Morren D; Kshettry VR; Recinos PF
J Neurosurg; 2023 Sep; 139(3):790-797. PubMed ID: 36738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the chiasm-pituitary corridor size important for achieving gross-total resection during endonasal endoscopic resection of craniopharyngiomas?
Omay SB; Almeida JP; Chen YN; Shetty SR; Liang B; Ni S; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
J Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 129(3):642-647. PubMed ID: 29171802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The learning curve in endoscopic endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas.
Kshettry VR; Do H; Elshazly K; Farrell CJ; Nyquist G; Rosen M; Evans JJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E9. PubMed ID: 27903119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery from diabetes insipidus and preservation of thyroid function after craniopharyngioma removal and pituitary stalk sectioning.
Ogawa Y; Niizuma K; Tominaga T
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 162():36-40. PubMed ID: 28917091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complication Avoidance in Endonasal Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery.
Sharma BS; Ranwa A; Garg K
Neurol India; 2020; 68(Supplement):S85-S91. PubMed ID: 32611897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index.
Leng LZ; Greenfield JP; Souweidane MM; Anand VK; Schwartz TH
Neurosurgery; 2012 Jan; 70(1):110-23; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 21937943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of pituitary stalk management with endocrine outcomes and recurrence in microsurgery of craniopharyngiomas: A meta-analysis.
Li K; Lu X; Yang N; Zheng J; Huang B; Li L
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 136():20-4. PubMed ID: 26056807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of postoperative vasospasm following endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma: Report and review of literature.
Aggarwal V; Nair P; Shivhare P; Kumar KS; Jayadevan ER; Nair S
Neurol India; 2019; 67(2):606-609. PubMed ID: 31085895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for recurrent or residual adult craniopharyngiomas.
Kim SK; Kim YH; Park CK; Kim DG; Jung HW
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Oct; 156(10):1917-22. PubMed ID: 24947753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indocyanine green endoscopic evaluation of pituitary stalk and gland blood flow in craniopharyngiomas.
Makino R; Fujio S; Sugata J; Yonenaga M; Hanada T; Higa N; Yamahata H; Hanaya R
Neurosurg Rev; 2023 Nov; 46(1):312. PubMed ID: 37996551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas.
Wannemuehler TJ; Rubel KE; Hendricks BK; Ting JY; Payner TD; Shah MV; Cohen-Gadol AA
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Dec; 41(6):E6. PubMed ID: 27903125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of preserving the pituitary stalk during resection of craniopharyngioma: A case series.
Huang K; Zhou L; Chen Y; Liu C; Zhao L; Liu Y; Liu P
Asian J Surg; 2023 Apr; 46(4):1639-1640. PubMed ID: 36207206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of preserving the superior hypophyseal artery infundibular branch in craniopharyngioma surgery.
Sasaki H; Takeuchi K; Nagata Y; Tanahashi K; Mizuno A; Harada H; Kishida Y; Watanabe T; Nagatani T; Saito R
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Mar; 165(3):667-675. PubMed ID: 36355231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial Reconstitution of the Hypothalamo-Pituitary Axes After Pituitary Stalk Sectioning and Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.
Ogawa Y; Tominaga T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e81-e87. PubMed ID: 31306837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transnasal endoscopic surgery for craniopharyngiomas.
Oldfield EH
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Apr; 28(4):E8a; discussion E8b. PubMed ID: 20367366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic endonasal surgery outcomes for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a systematic review.
Soldozy S; Yeghyayan M; Yağmurlu K; Norat P; Taylor DG; Kalani MYS; Jane JA; Syed HR
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Jan; 48(1):E6. PubMed ID: 31896083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spontaneous resolution of diabetes insipidus after pituitary stalk sectioning during surgery for large craniopharyngioma. Endocrinological evaluation and clinical implications for surgical strategy.
Nishizawa S; Ohta S; Oki Y
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2006 Mar; 46(3):126-34; discussion 134-5. PubMed ID: 16565582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
