150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36333963)
1. Cost-effectiveness of anlotinib vs. pembrolizumab and nivolumab as third-line treatment in recurrent small cell lung cancer in China.
Fei Z; Rui M; Wang Y; Ma A
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023 Jan; 23(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 36333963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anlotinib as Third- or Further-Line Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) in China.
Gong J; Wan Q; Shang J; Qian X; Su D; Sun Z; Liu G
Adv Ther; 2021 Oct; 38(10):5116-5126. PubMed ID: 34417989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Liu Q; Luo X; Peng L; Yi L; Wan X; Zeng X; Tan C
Clin Drug Investig; 2020 Feb; 40(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 31679121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Osimertinib vs Docetaxel-bevacizumab in Third-line Treatment in EGFR T790M Resistance Mutation Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.
Rui M; Li H
Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2159-2170.e6. PubMed ID: 33028495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Berling M; Chaudhary MA; Yuan Y; Varol N; Dale P; Testa E; Klint J; Lee A; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):703-711. PubMed ID: 35659172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Polyzoi M; Sandhu H; Maervoet J; Yuan Y; Chaudhary MA; Varol N; Lee A; Dale P; Jones C; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):660-668. PubMed ID: 35658806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.
Zhao M; Shao T; Chi Z; Tang W
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1051484. PubMed ID: 36908446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Zhu Q; Ni R; Guan X
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 12(8):1782-1789. PubMed ID: 37691869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of mixture cure fraction models to traditional parametric survival models in estimation of the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab for relapsed small cell lung cancer.
Roth JA; Yuan Y; Othus M; Danese M; Wagner S; Penrod JR; Ramsey SD
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 33334176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with adjuvant pembrolizumab for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Tian W; Niu L; Wang Z; Lu R; Xiao G; Deng F; Tanzhu G; Zhou R
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1268070. PubMed ID: 37822936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Ondhia U; Conter HJ; Owen S; Zhou A; Nam J; Singh S; Abdulla A; Chu P; Felizzi F; Paracha N; Sangha R
J Med Econ; 2019 Jul; 22(7):625-637. PubMed ID: 30836031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in the third-line treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Smare C; Dave K; Juarez-Garcia A; Abraham P; Penrod JR; Camidge DR; Yuan Y
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):1124-1133. PubMed ID: 34465261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in China.
Zheng Z; Song X; Qiu G; Xu S; Cai H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Mar; 39(3):433-440. PubMed ID: 36757780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Vs Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
Watson TR; Gao X; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2016144. PubMed ID: 33052401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the optimal PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for the first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with high-level PD-L1 expression in China.
Teng MM; Chen SY; Yang B; Wang Y; Han RY; An MN; Dong YL; You HS
Cancer Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):6344-6353. PubMed ID: 34382361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First-line pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the UK health care perspective.
Hu X; Hay JW
Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():166-171. PubMed ID: 30089590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial.
Xin W; Ding H; Fang Q; Zheng X; Tong Y; Xu G; Yang G
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e038867. PubMed ID: 33371020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
