128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36334321)
1. How getting twisted in scaffold design can promote bone regeneration: A fluid-structure interaction evaluation.
Wang L; Wang J; Chen Q; Li Q; Mendieta JB; Li Z
J Biomech; 2022 Dec; 145():111359. PubMed ID: 36334321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wall Shear Stress Analysis and Optimization in Tissue Engineering TPMS Scaffolds.
Pires THV; Dunlop JWC; Castro APG; Fernandes PR
Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures.
Zhao F; Vaughan TJ; McNamara LM
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Jun; 15(3):561-77. PubMed ID: 26224148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: A review of in vivo studies in bone defect models.
El-Rashidy AA; Roether JA; Harhaus L; Kneser U; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2017 Oct; 62():1-28. PubMed ID: 28844964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in scaffold porosity during bone tissue engineering in perfusion bioreactors considerably affect cellular mechanical stimulation for mineralization.
Zhao F; Lacroix D; Ito K; van Rietbergen B; Hofmann S
Bone Rep; 2020 Jun; 12():100265. PubMed ID: 32613033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scaffold Pore Geometry Guides Gene Regulation and Bone-like Tissue Formation in Dynamic Cultures.
Rubert M; Vetsch JR; Lehtoviita I; Sommer M; Zhao F; Studart AR; Müller R; Hofmann S
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1192-1204. PubMed ID: 33297842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Composite polymer-bioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering.
Mouriño V; Cattalini JP; Roether JA; Dubey P; Roy I; Boccaccini AR
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2013 Oct; 10(10):1353-65. PubMed ID: 23777443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo.
Mitsak AG; Kemppainen JM; Harris MT; Hollister SJ
Tissue Eng Part A; 2011 Jul; 17(13-14):1831-9. PubMed ID: 21395465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Transplanted with Nanohydroxyapatite/Chitosan/Gelatin 3D Porous Scaffolds Promote Jaw Bone Regeneration in Swine.
Zhao Q; Li G; Wang T; Jin Y; Lu W; Ji J
Stem Cells Dev; 2021 May; 30(10):548-559. PubMed ID: 33736461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modular design strategy to integrate mechanotransduction concepts in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering.
Entezari A; Swain MV; Gooding JJ; Roohani I; Li Q
Acta Biomater; 2020 Dec; 118():100-112. PubMed ID: 33059100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone Tissue Engineering Using Osteogenic Cells: From the Bench to the Clinical Application.
Shibli JA; Nagay BE; Suárez LJ; Urdániga Hung C; Bertolini M; Barão VAR; Souza JGS
Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2022 May; 28(5):179-192. PubMed ID: 35166162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.
Amini AR; Adams DJ; Laurencin CT; Nukavarapu SP
Tissue Eng Part A; 2012 Jul; 18(13-14):1376-88. PubMed ID: 22401817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in silico model predicts the impact of scaffold design in large bone defect regeneration.
Perier-Metz C; Cipitria A; Hutmacher DW; Duda GN; Checa S
Acta Biomater; 2022 Jun; 145():329-341. PubMed ID: 35417799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.
Pires T; Dunlop JWC; Fernandes PR; Castro APG
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2022 Jan; 478(2257):20210607. PubMed ID: 35153613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combination of Heel-strike like Mechanical Loading with Deproteinized Cancellous Bone Scaffold Implantation to Repair Segmental Bone Defects in Rabbits.
Huang G; Liu G; Zhang F; Gao J; Wang J; Chen Q; Wu B; Ding Z; Cai T
Int J Med Sci; 2017; 14(9):871-879. PubMed ID: 28824324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomimetic mineralization of novel hydroxyethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate scaffolds promote bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo.
Wu M; Wu P; Xiao L; Zhao Y; Yan F; Liu X; Xie Y; Zhang C; Chen Y; Cai L
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 162():1627-1641. PubMed ID: 32781127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures.
Ali D; Sen S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():262-270. PubMed ID: 28759838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface engineering of 3D-printed scaffolds with minerals and a pro-angiogenic factor for vascularized bone regeneration.
Lee J; Huh SJ; Seok JM; Lee S; Byun H; Jang GN; Kim E; Kim SJ; Park SA; Kim SM; Shin H
Acta Biomater; 2022 Mar; 140():730-744. PubMed ID: 34896633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. P34HB electrospun fibres promote bone regeneration in vivo.
Fu N; Meng Z; Jiao T; Luo X; Tang Z; Zhu B; Sui L; Cai X
Cell Prolif; 2019 May; 52(3):e12601. PubMed ID: 30896076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
