397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36335345)
1. A review of user needs to drive the development of lower limb prostheses.
Manz S; Valette R; Damonte F; Avanci Gaudio L; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Sartori M; Dosen S; Rietman J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 36335345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.
Fanciullacci C; McKinney Z; Monaco V; Milandri G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Baldoni A; Mazzoni A; Paternò L; Rosini E; Reale L; Trecate F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Gruppioni E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 34863213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriateness of advanced upper limb prosthesis prescription for a patient with cognitive impairment: a case report.
Barredo J; Acluche F; Disla R; Fantini C; Fishelis L; Sasson N; Resnik L
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):647-656. PubMed ID: 27434169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motorized Biomechatronic Upper and Lower Limb Prostheses-Clinically Relevant Outcomes.
Lechler K; Frossard B; Whelan L; Langlois D; Müller R; Kristjansson K
PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S207-S219. PubMed ID: 30269806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey.
Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Clark MA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 31960734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life, body image, and mobility in lower-limb amputees using high-tech prostheses: A pragmatic trial.
Burçak B; Kesikburun B; Köseoğlu BF; Öken Ö; Doğan A
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Jan; 64(1):101405. PubMed ID: 32561506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dexterity, activity performance, disability, quality of life, and independence in upper limb Veteran prosthesis users: a normative study.
Resnik L; Borgia M; Cancio J; Heckman J; Highsmith J; Levy C; Phillips S; Webster J
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(11):2470-2481. PubMed ID: 33073621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osseointegration for Lower-Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.
Hebert JS; Rehani M; Stiegelmar R
JBJS Rev; 2017 Oct; 5(10):e10. PubMed ID: 29087966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experiences of lower limb prosthetic users in a rural setting in the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.
Ennion L; Manig S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):170-179. PubMed ID: 30112980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): Quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis.
Wurdeman SR; Stevens PM; Campbell JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 28990467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifying the five-time sit-to-stand test to allow use of the upper limbs: Assessing initial evidence of construct validity among lower limb prosthesis users.
Gaunaurd IA; Morgan SJ; Balkman GS; Kristal A; Rosen RE; Haynes JS; Gailey RS; Hafner BJ
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279543. PubMed ID: 36763586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.
Tan JM; Halford GRJ; Lukin M; Kohler F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Feb; 47(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 36629556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amputee, clinician, and regulator perspectives on current and prospective upper extremity prosthetic technologies.
Rekant J; Fisher LE; Boninger ML; Gaunt RA; Collinger JL
Assist Technol; 2023 May; 35(3):258-270. PubMed ID: 34982647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A User-Driven Approach to Prosthetic Upper Limb Development in Korea.
Ju N; Lee KH; Kim MO; Choi Y
Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 34356217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional capacity of elderly with lower-limb amputation after prosthesis rehabilitation: a longitudinal study.
Silva ADM; Furtado G; Dos Santos IP; da Silva CB; Caldas LR; Bernardes KO; Ferraz DD
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):556-560. PubMed ID: 31686579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.
Kerver N; van Twillert S; Maas B; van der Sluis CK
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234342. PubMed ID: 32603326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience of adults with upper-limb difference and their views on sensory feedback for prostheses: a mixed methods study.
Jabban L; Metcalfe BW; Raines J; Zhang D; Ainsworth B
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 35870940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
