These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3633600)
1. Premature extubation: death in recovery room. Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Jan; 26(8):1. PubMed ID: 3633600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital must abide by contractual agreement despite JCAH standards. Fraiche DD; Carlson WT Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):9-10. PubMed ID: 10289703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liability looms large when patients sue because of anesthesia accidents. Horty J Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(5):126-8. PubMed ID: 10270815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. O.R. mishap now a legal case. Health Care Educ; 1978 Dec; 7(6):12, 42. PubMed ID: 10316754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Oral okay upheld but written preferred. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1978 Mar; 8(3):64, 67. PubMed ID: 146816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Legal aspects in the assuring of anesthesiologic care]. Langanke A; Langanke D; Baust G; Mandel J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 1985; 10(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 4096824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The courts look at the exclusive contract for providing anesthesia services. Kucera WR AANA J; 1981 Apr; 49(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 7223347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Antitrust developments. Hospital exclusive contracts and the Department of Justice vertical restraints guidelines. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 10270265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifth Circuit finds exclusive contract for anesthesia services violates antitrust laws. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 10256931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court's Hyde decision: what is its significance? Waxman M; Enders RJ Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 10266389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health law--the legal implications in utilizing the nurse anesthetist in place of the anesthesiologist. Eskreis TR Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Jun; 8(4):7-32. PubMed ID: 10278780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision. Reed TJ; Allen HS Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract against antitrust challenge in Hyde case. Tomaselli LA Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10265826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal case briefs for nurses. NY: baby stolen from hospital: liability. KY: hosp. liability for nurse-anesthetist's error. Regan WA Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Dec; 24(7):3. PubMed ID: 6558736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in antitrust/exclusive contract action. Tomaselli LA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Nov; 6(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10263299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]