137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36336248)
41. Self-collection based HPV testing for cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in Uganda: a descriptive analysis of knowledge, intentions to screen and factors associated with HPV positivity.
Mitchell SM; Pedersen HN; Eng Stime E; Sekikubo M; Moses E; Mwesigwa D; Biryabarema C; Christilaw J; Byamugisha JK; Money DM; Ogilvie GS
BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28086933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.
Kamineni A; Tiro JA; Beaber EF; Silverberg MJ; Wheeler CM; Chao CR; Chubak J; Skinner CS; Corley DA; Kim JJ; Balasubramanian BA; Paul Doria-Rose V;
Int J Cancer; 2019 Mar; 144(6):1460-1473. PubMed ID: 30353911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Change in Provider Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals After an Educational Intervention.
Benard VB; Greek A; Roland KB; Hawkins NA; Lin L; Saraiya M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 27096534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences Among Trans-Masculine Individuals: Patient-Collected Human Papillomavirus Vaginal Swabs Versus Provider-Administered Pap Tests.
McDowell M; Pardee DJ; Peitzmeier S; Reisner SL; Agénor M; Alizaga N; Bernstein I; Potter J
LGBT Health; 2017 Aug; 4(4):252-259. PubMed ID: 28665783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Study protocol of the ACCESS trial: a randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing by self-sampling in cervical cancer screening uptake and precancer detection.
Fujita M; Shimazu M; Nagashima K; Suzuki M; Tauchi I; Sakuma M; Yamamoto S; Shozu M; Hanaoka H; Tsuruoka N; Kasai T; Hata A
BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e049803. PubMed ID: 35115348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Acting on the call for cervical cancer elimination: Planning tools for low- and middle- income countries to increase the coverage and effectiveness of screening and treatment.
Herrick T; Thomson KA; Shin M; Gannon S; Tsu V; de Sanjosé S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1246. PubMed ID: 36241993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48.
Zammit CM; Creagh NS; McDermott T; Smith MA; Machalek DA; Jennett CJ; Prang KH; Sultana F; Nightingale CE; Rankin NM; Kelaher M; Brotherton JML
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparative assessment of test characteristics of cervical cancer screening methods for implementation in low-resource settings.
Asgary R; Beideck E; Naderi R
Prev Med; 2022 Jan; 154():106883. PubMed ID: 34785209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Women's intentions to self-collect samples for human papillomavirus testing in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Smith LW; Khurshed F; van Niekerk DJ; Krajden M; Greene SB; Hobbs S; Coldman AJ; Franco EL; Ogilvie GS
BMC Public Health; 2014 Oct; 14():1060. PubMed ID: 25303975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) test acceptability in primary screening for cervical cancer: A mixed methods research synthesis.
Tatar O; Thompson E; Naz A; Perez S; Shapiro GK; Wade K; Zimet G; Gilca V; Janda M; Kahn J; Daley E; Rosberger Z
Prev Med; 2018 Nov; 116():40-50. PubMed ID: 30172799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors: design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian cervical cancer screening trial (CCCaST).
Mayrand MH; Duarte-Franco E; Coutlée F; Rodrigues I; Walter SD; Ratnam S; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2006 Aug; 119(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 16572425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of self-collection of HPV DNA offered by community health workers at home visits on uptake of screening for cervical cancer (the EMA study): a population-based cluster-randomised trial.
Arrossi S; Thouyaret L; Herrero R; Campanera A; Magdaleno A; Cuberli M; Barletta P; Laudi R; Orellana L;
Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Feb; 3(2):e85-94. PubMed ID: 25617202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1.
Lea CS; Perez-Heydrich C; Des Marais AC; Richman AR; Barclay L; Brewer NT; Smith JS
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Aug; 28(8):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 30874477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Implementation and scaling-up of an effective mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of HPV-positive women (ATICA study): perceptions of health decision-makers and health-care providers.
Straw C; Sanchez-Antelo V; Kohler R; Paolino M; Viswanath K; Arrossi S
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Jan; 23(1):47. PubMed ID: 36653775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention.
Roland KB; Benard VB; Greek A; Hawkins NA; Lin L
J Prim Care Community Health; 2016 Apr; 7(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 26763304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial.
Vogel JP; Pingray V; Althabe F; Gibbons L; Berrueta M; Pujar Y; Somannavar M; Vernekar SS; Ciganda A; Rodriguez R; Welling SA; Revankar A; Bendigeri S; Kumar JA; Patil SB; Karinagannanavar A; Anteen RR; Pavithra MR; Shetty S; Latha B; Megha HM; Gaddi SS; Chikkagowdra S; Raghavendra B; Armari E; Scott N; Eddy K; Homer CSE; Goudar SS
Reprod Health; 2023 Jan; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 36670438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Community-based HPV self-collection versus visual inspection with acetic acid in Uganda: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ASPIRE trial.
Mezei AK; Pedersen HN; Sy S; Regan C; Mitchell-Foster SM; Byamugisha J; Sekikubo M; Armstrong H; Rawat A; Singer J; Ogilvie GS; Kim JJ; Campos NG
BMJ Open; 2018 Jun; 8(6):e020484. PubMed ID: 29895648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness assessment.
Barré S; Massetti M; Leleu H; De Bels F
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e014626. PubMed ID: 28988162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
