These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36336458)
1. Degradation of polymer banknotes through handling, and effect on fingermark visualisation. Jones BJ; Cammidge JW; Evans C; Scott G; Sherriffs PB; Breen F; Andersen PMB; Popov KT; O'Hara J Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):644-656. PubMed ID: 36336458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of fingermark enhancement techniques on Clydesdale Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland £10 and £5 polymer banknotes in a pseudo-operational trial. Joannidis CA; Haddrill PR; Laing K Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Aug; 349():111758. PubMed ID: 37331048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fingermark visualisation on uncirculated £5 (Bank of England) polymer notes: Initial process comparison studies. Downham RP; Brewer ER; King RSP; Luscombe AM; Sears VG Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():30-43. PubMed ID: 28292656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of the most effective enhancement process for latent fingermarks on Clydesdale Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland £5 and £10 polymer banknotes. Joannidis CA; Haddrill PR; Laing K Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jul; 312():110334. PubMed ID: 32460226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequential processing strategies for fingermark visualisation on uncirculated £10 (Bank of England) polymer banknotes. Downham RP; Brewer ER; King RSP; Sears VG Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():140-158. PubMed ID: 29753152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the use of vacuum metal deposition versus cyanoacrylate fuming for visualisation of fingermarks and grab impressions on fabrics. Fraser J; Deacon P; Bleay S; Bremner DH Sci Justice; 2014 Mar; 54(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24630323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visualisation of latent fingermarks on polymer banknotes using copper vacuum metal deposition: A preliminary study. Davis LWL; Kelly PF; King RSP; Bleay SM Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():e86-e92. PubMed ID: 27342344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biodegradable plastics and their impact on fingermark detection methods. Woodward H; Moret S; Chadwick S Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111571. PubMed ID: 36702004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four novel alkyl 2-cyanoacylate monomers and their use in latent fingermark detection by mid-infrared spectral imaging. Tahtouh M; Scott SA; Kalman JR; Reedy BJ Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 21074340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancement of fingermarks and visualizing DNA. Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride KP; Kobus H; Linacre A Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():99-105. PubMed ID: 31085432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fingermark visualisation on compostable polymers - A comparison among different procedures as an outcome of the 2020 collaborative exercise of the ENFSI Fingerprint Working Group. Zampa F; Hilgert M; Mattei A; Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jun; 335():111276. PubMed ID: 35364553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The detection and enhancement of latent fingermarks using infrared chemical imaging. Tahtouh M; Kalman JR; Roux C; Lennard C; Reedy BJ J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 15830998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vacuum metal deposition: visualisation of gold agglomerates using TEM imaging. Dai X; Stoilovic M; Lennard C; Speers N Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):219-22. PubMed ID: 16513309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation into the use of a portable cyanoacrylate fuming system (SUPERfume®) and aluminum powder for the development of latent fingermarks. Fieldhouse SJ J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1514-20. PubMed ID: 21790600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nanoscale analysis of the interaction between cyanoacrylate and vacuum metal deposition in the development of latent fingermarks on low-density polyethylene. Jones BJ; Downham R; Sears VG J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 22074186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of scanning Kelvin probe with SEM/EPMA techniques for fingermark recovery from metallic surfaces. Challinger SE; Baikie ID; Flannigan G; Halls S; Laing K; Daly L; Nic Daeid N Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():44-52. PubMed ID: 30138750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visualisation of fingermarks and grab impressions on dark fabrics using silver vacuum metal deposition. Knighting S; Fraser J; Sturrock K; Deacon P; Bleay S; Bremner DH Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 23937939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fingermark visualisation on metal surfaces: An initial investigation of the influence of surface condition on process effectiveness. Pitera M; Sears VG; Bleay SM; Park S Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):372-383. PubMed ID: 30193663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fingerprint detection on counterfeit US dollar banknotes: the importance of preliminary paper examination. Azoury M; Cohen D; Himberg K; Qvintus-Leino P; Saari T; Almog J J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):1015-7. PubMed ID: 15461103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]