These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36336608)

  • 1. Comparative efficacy and safety of resection techniques for treating 6 to 20mm, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Papaefthymiou A; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Marco S; Frazzoni L; Fuccio L; Paraskeva KD; Hassan C; Repici A; Sharma P; Rex DK; Triantafyllou K; Messmann H; Gkolfakis P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jul; 55(7):856-864. PubMed ID: 36336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Higher rate of en bloc resection with underwater than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: A meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K; Fuccio L; Facciorusso A; Papanikolaou IS; Antonelli G; Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Probst A; Hassan C; Messmann H
    Dig Liver Dis; 2021 Aug; 53(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 34059445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Arruda do Espirito Santo P; Meine GC; Baraldo S; Barbosa EC
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jul; 56(7):503-511. PubMed ID: 38503302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness and safety of the different endoscopic resection methods for 10- to 20-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: A systematic review and pooled analysis.
    Yuan X; Gao H; Liu C; Cui H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Lu H; Xu L
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2021; 27(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 34643573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liang Z; Wei Y; Zhang S; Li P
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Nov; 38(11):1892-1899. PubMed ID: 37608577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.
    Mangira D; Raftopoulos S; Vogrin S; Hartley I; Mack A; Gazelakis K; Nalankilli K; Trinh A; Metz AJ; Appleyard M; Grimpen F; Elliott T; Brown G; Moss A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 36750222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting
    Zhang XQ; Sang JZ; Xu L; Mao XL; Li B; Zhu WL; Yang XY; Yu CH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 28(45):6397-6409. PubMed ID: 36533110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic mucosal resection using cold snare versus hot snare in treatment for 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: protocol of a non-inferiority randomised controlled study.
    Jiang Q; Yan X; Wang D; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Feng Y; Yang A; Wu D
    BMJ Open; 2023 May; 13(5):e070321. PubMed ID: 37217262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cold polypectomy techniques for small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Abuelazm M; Awad AK; Mohamed I; Mahmoud A; Shaikhkhalil H; Shaheen N; Abdelwahab O; Afifi AM; Abdelazeem B; Othman MO
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Oct; 39(10):1329-1339. PubMed ID: 37735986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis.
    Thoguluva Chandrasekar V; Spadaccini M; Aziz M; Maselli R; Hassan S; Fuccio L; Duvvuri A; Frazzoni L; Desai M; Fugazza A; Jegadeesan R; Colombo M; Dasari CS; Hassan C; Sharma P; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):929-936.e3. PubMed ID: 30639542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.
    Papastergiou V; Paraskeva KD; Fragaki M; Dimas I; Vardas E; Theodoropoulou A; Mathou N; Giannakopoulos A; Karmiris K; Mpitouli A; Apessou D; Giannikaki L; Karagiannis JA; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
    Endoscopy; 2018 Apr; 50(4):403-411. PubMed ID: 28898922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.
    Ferlitsch M; Hassan C; Bisschops R; Bhandari P; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Risio M; Paspatis GA; Moss A; Libânio D; Lorenzo-Zúñiga V; Voiosu AM; Rutter MD; Pellisé M; Moons LMG; Probst A; Awadie H; Amato A; Takeuchi Y; Repici A; Rahmi G; Koecklin HU; Albéniz E; Rockenbauer LM; Waldmann E; Messmann H; Triantafyllou K; Jover R; Gralnek IM; Dekker E; Bourke MJ
    Endoscopy; 2024 Jul; 56(7):516-545. PubMed ID: 38670139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Kim MJ; Na SY; Kim JS; Choi HH; Kim DB; Ji JS; Kim BW; Choi H
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3789-3795. PubMed ID: 36690892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Oh CK; Cho YS; Lee SH; Lee BI
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 35750321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rotermund C; Djinbachian R; Taghiakbari M; Enderle MD; Eickhoff A; von Renteln D
    World J Gastroenterol; 2022 Aug; 28(29):4007-4018. PubMed ID: 36157546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hot snare polypectomy
    Minakata N; Murano T; Wakabayashi M; Sasabe M; Watanabe T; Mitsui T; Yamashita H; Inaba A; Sunakawa H; Nakajo K; Kadota T; Shinmura K; Ikematsu H; Yano T
    World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 29(23):3668-3677. PubMed ID: 37398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and histologic accuracy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (>20 mm) colorectal polyps: a comparative review and meta-analysis.
    Chandan S; Khan SR; Kumar A; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Kassab LL; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Kochhar GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Sep; 94(3):471-482.e9. PubMed ID: 33385463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polypectomy for complete endoscopic resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Zhang Q; Gao P; Han B; Xu J; Shen Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):733-740. PubMed ID: 28647136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized trial.
    Horiuchi A; Makino T; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 27100717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.