These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36336608)

  • 21. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized trial.
    Horiuchi A; Makino T; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jul; 48(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 27100717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Liu W; Gong J; Gu L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 38(1):136. PubMed ID: 37204495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Kim HS; Jung HY; Park HJ; Kim HM; Seong JH; Kang YS; Cho MY; Yu MH; Kang DR
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 29409923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Safety and efficacy of low-power pure-cut hot snare polypectomy for small nonpedunculated colorectal polyps compared with conventional resection methods: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Kimura H; Oi M; Imai K; Imai T; Morita Y; Nishida A; Bamba S; Inatomi O; Andoh A
    DEN Open; 2025 Apr; 5(1):e378. PubMed ID: 38715897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3-10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Wang ST; Kong QZ; Li YQ; Ji R
    Digestion; 2024; 105(3):157-165. PubMed ID: 38198754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cold resection for colorectal polyps: where we are and where we are going?
    Capogreco A; Alfarone L; Massimi D; Repici A
    Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023; 17(7):719-730. PubMed ID: 37318101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (c-EMR) of Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps ≥20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ramai D; Clement B; Maida M; Previtera M; Brooks OW; Wang Y; Chandan S; Dhindsa B; Deliwala S; Facciorusso A; Khashab M; Ofosu A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2024 Aug; 58(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 38227846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection for 3-10-mm colorectal polyps in end-stage renal disease patients.
    Oh CK; Choi HS; Cho YS
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2022; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 34755710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shinozaki S; Kobayashi Y; Hayashi Y; Sakamoto H; Lefor AK; Yamamoto H
    Dig Endosc; 2018 Sep; 30(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 29675857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Lv YC; Yao YH; Lei JJ; Tang T
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 42(6):757-765. PubMed ID: 37776439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cold or Hot Snare with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 6-9 mm Colorectal Polyps: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Guo Y; Li HM; Zhu WQ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2022 Feb; 32(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 33651638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Lai MG; Yang MF; Zou ZY; Xu J; Peng RM; Xiong F; Wei C; Zhang DG; Xu ZL; Wang LS; Yao J
    Endoscopy; 2021 Jun; 53(6):636-646. PubMed ID: 32767283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hot snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kim SJ; Lee BI; Jung ES; Kim JS; Jun SY; Kim W; Ham H; Kim M; Lee SH; Lee HH; Park JM; Choi MG
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5096-5103. PubMed ID: 32989532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Tranquillini CV; Bernardo WM; Brunaldi VO; Moura ET; Marques SB; Moura EGH
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2018; 55(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 30785519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Anderson JC; Pohl H; Lahr RE; Judd S; Antaki F; Lilley K; Castelluccio PF; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 35288147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Chandan S; Bapaye J; Khan SR; Mohan BP; Ramai D; Dahiya DS; Bilal M; Draganov PV; Othman MO; Rodriguez Sánchez J; Kochhar GS
    Endosc Int Open; 2023 Aug; 11(8):E768-E777. PubMed ID: 37593155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li DF; Van Overbeke L; Ohata K; Wang LS; Yao J
    Dig Liver Dis; 2022 Nov; 54(11):1486-1493. PubMed ID: 35168877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.
    Tate DJ; Argenziano ME; Anderson J; Bhandari P; Boškoski I; Bugajski M; Desomer L; Heitman SJ; Kashida H; Kriazhov V; Lee RRT; Lyutakov I; Pimentel-Nunes P; Rivero-Sánchez L; Thomas-Gibson S; Thorlacius H; Bourke MJ; Tham TC; Bisschops R
    Endoscopy; 2023 Jul; 55(7):645-679. PubMed ID: 37285908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis.
    Li X; Zhu H; Li F; Li R; Xu H
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2023; 10():1154411. PubMed ID: 37089613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.