139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36336728)
1. Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5.
Panunzio A; Sorce G; Hoeh B; Hohenhorst L; Tappero S; Nimer N; Rajwa P; Tian Z; Terrone C; Chun FKH; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Cerruto MA; Antonelli A; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(3):268-276. PubMed ID: 36336728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Mazzone E; Knipper S; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Shariat SF; Tian Z; Saad F; Montorsi F; Zorn KC; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e130-e139. PubMed ID: 30366880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pattern of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy.
Wenzel M; Würnschimmel C; Chierigo F; Mori K; Tian Z; Terrone C; Shariat SF; Saad F; Tilki D; Graefen M; Mandel P; Roos FC; Chun FKH; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 May; 8(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 33933420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Presence of biopsy Gleason pattern 5 + 3 is associated with higher mortality after radical prostatectomy but not after external beam radiotherapy compared to other Gleason Grade Group IV patterns.
Würnschimmel C; Wenzel M; Chierigo F; Flammia RS; Mori K; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Saad F; Briganti A; Suardi N; Terrone C; Gallucci M; Chun FKH; Tilki D; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2021 Aug; 81(11):778-784. PubMed ID: 34057220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival after radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinical node-positive prostate cancer.
Chierigo F; Borghesi M; Würnschimmel C; Flammia RS; Horlemann B; Sorce G; Hoeh B; Tian Z; Saad F; Graefen M; Gallucci M; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Chun FKH; Shariat SF; Mantica G; Suardi N; Terrone C; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2022 May; 82(6):740-750. PubMed ID: 35226380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oncologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason grade group 4-5 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Preisser F; Wang N; Abrams-Pompe RS; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):161.e9-161.e14. PubMed ID: 34973856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival after Radical Prostatectomy versus Radiation Therapy in High-Risk and Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Chierigo F; Wenzel M; Würnschimmel C; Flammia RS; Horlemann B; Tian Z; Saad F; Chun FKH; Graefen M; Gallucci M; Shariat SF; Mantica G; Borghesi M; Suardi N; Terrone C; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):375-384. PubMed ID: 34555930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect on survival of local treatment in patients with low prostate-specific antigen, high Gleason score prostate cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.
Liu S; Wang XY; Huang TB; Niu Q; Yao K; Song X; Zhou SY; Chen Z; Zhou GC
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Jul; 9(4):1708-1717. PubMed ID: 32527134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival after radical prostatectomy vs. radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma of the prostate.
Chierigo F; Borghesi M; Würnschimmel C; Flammia RS; Horlemann B; Sorce G; Höh B; Tian Z; Saad F; Graefen M; Gallucci M; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Chun FKH; Shariat SF; Mantica G; Suardi N; Terrone C; Karakiewicz PI
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Jan; 54(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 34797483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Lymph Node Metastases Burden at Radical Prostatectomy.
Preisser F; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Montorsi F; Saad F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 29306731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.
Preisser F; Bandini M; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Fossati N; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Prostate; 2018 May; 78(6):469-475. PubMed ID: 29460290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Lymph Node Dissection in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of Survival and Early Postoperative Outcomes.
Mazzone E; Preisser F; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Bandini M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Shariat SF; Saad F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):541-548. PubMed ID: 31411992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
