131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36338157)
1. Automatic Coregistration Between Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography: Feasibility and Accuracy.
Qin H; Li C; Li Y; Huang J; Yang F; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Xiao C; Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Tu S
JACC Asia; 2021 Sep; 1(2):274-278. PubMed ID: 36338157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, single-center, randomized study to assess whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography with angiography can reduce geographic miss.
Koyama K; Fujino A; Maehara A; Yamamoto MH; Alexandru D; Jennings J; Krug P; Santiago LM; Murray M; Bongiovanni L; Lee T; Kim SY; Wang X; Lin Y; Matsumura M; Ali ZA; Sosa F; Haag E; Mintz GS; Shlofmitz RA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 30345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
Tu S; Xu L; Ligthart J; Xu B; Witberg K; Sun Z; Koning G; Reiber JH; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Aug; 28(6):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22261998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of optical coherence tomography with angiographic coregistration in the guidance of coronary stent implantation.
Kubo T; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Terada K; Emori H; Higashioka D; Takahata M; Wada T; Shimamura K; Khalifa AKM; Tu S; Akasaka T
Heart Vessels; 2022 Feb; 37(2):200-207. PubMed ID: 34287687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online coregistration of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.
McInerney A; Escaned J; Gonzalo N
Minerva Cardiol Angiol; 2021 Dec; 69(6):641-654. PubMed ID: 34137237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound or angiography guidance for distal left main coronary stenting. The ROCK cohort II study.
Cortese B; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Lanocha M; Ielasi A; Giannini F; Campo G; D'Ascenzo F; Latini RA; Krestianinov O; Alfonso F; Trani C; Prati F; Linares JA; Sardella G; Wlodarczak A; Viganò E; Camarero TG; Stella P; Sozykin A; Fineschi M; Burzotta F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 34582631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Real-time optical coherence tomography coregistration with angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention-impact on physician decision-making: The OPTICO-integration study.
Leistner DM; Riedel M; Steinbeck L; Stähli BE; Fröhlich GM; Lauten A; Skurk C; Mochmann HC; Lübking L; Rauch-Kröhnert U; Schnabel RB; Westermann D; Blankenberg S; Landmesser U
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 28940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Huang Z; Reiber JH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21264684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main coronary artery.
Miura K; Tada T; Shimada T; Ohya M; Murai R; Kubo S; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Goto T; Kadota K
Heart Vessels; 2021 May; 36(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 33389063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study.
Hebsgaard L; Nielsen TM; Tu S; Krusell LR; Maeng M; Veien KT; Raungaard B; Terkelsen CJ; Kaltoft A; Reiber JH; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 182():272-8. PubMed ID: 25585362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiography Alone Versus Angiography Plus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes From the Pan-London PCI Cohort.
Jones DA; Rathod KS; Koganti S; Hamshere S; Astroulakis Z; Lim P; Sirker A; O'Mahony C; Jain AK; Knight CJ; Dalby MC; Malik IS; Mathur A; Rakhit R; Lockie T; Redwood S; MacCarthy PA; Desilva R; Weerackody R; Wragg A; Smith EJ; Bourantas CV
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 11(14):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 30025725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel method to assess coronary artery bifurcations by OCT: cut-plane analysis for side-branch ostial assessment from a main-vessel pullback.
Karanasos A; Tu S; van Ditzhuijzen NS; Ligthart JM; Witberg K; Van Mieghem N; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Reiber JH; Regar E
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 16(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 25227268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
