These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36338317)

  • 1. Hybrid Monte Carlo estimators for multilayer transport problems.
    Zhao S; Spanier J
    J Comput Phys; 2021 Apr; 431():. PubMed ID: 36338317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transport-Constrained Extensions of Collision and Track Length Estimators for Solutions of Radiative Transport Problems.
    Kong R; Spanier J
    J Comput Phys; 2013 Jun; 242():682-695. PubMed ID: 24058206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expected-value techniques for Monte Carlo modeling of well logging problems.
    Mosher SW; Maučec M; Spanier J; Badruzzaman A; Chedester C; Evans M
    Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A; 2010 Feb; 613(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 36865351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo method for variance estimation for estimators based on induced smoothing.
    Jin Z; Shao Y; Ying Z
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 24812418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.
    Garès V; Chauvet G; Hajage D
    Biom J; 2022 Jan; 64(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 34327720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Monte Carlo evaluation of five interval estimators for the relative risk in sparse data.
    Lui KJ
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 16544818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo evaluation of kerma at a point for photon transport problems.
    Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(4):567-76. PubMed ID: 3626996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geometric Convergence of Adaptive Monte Carlo Algorithms for Radiative Transport Problems Based on Importance Sampling Methods.
    Kong R; Spanier J
    Nucl Sci Eng; 2011; 168(3):197-225. PubMed ID: 36081766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of discrete and continuous absorption weighting estimators used in Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transport in turbid media.
    Hayakawa CK; Spanier J; Venugopalan V
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Feb; 31(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 24562029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent Monte Carlo transport and fluence optimization with fluence adjusting scalable transport Monte Carlo.
    Yang YM; Svatos M; Zankowski C; Bednarz B
    Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):3034-3048. PubMed ID: 27277051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for energy window optimization for quantitative tasks that includes the effects of model-mismatch on bias: application to Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT imaging.
    Rong X; Du Y; Frey EC
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3711-25. PubMed ID: 22617760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.
    Fleeter CM; Geraci G; Schiavazzi DE; Kahn AM; Marsden AL
    Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng; 2020 Jun; 365():. PubMed ID: 32336811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of parameters of inverse Weibull distribution and application to multi-component stress-strength model.
    Jana N; Bera S
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(1):169-194. PubMed ID: 35707805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo calculation of kerma to a point in the vicinity of media interfaces.
    Li Z; Williamson JF; Perera H
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Dec; 38(12):1825-40. PubMed ID: 8108488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalizing the Balance Heuristic Estimator in Multiple Importance Sampling.
    Sbert M; Elvira V
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 35205487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5642-5655. PubMed ID: 27549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new proof of geometric convergence for the adaptive generalized weighted analog sampling (GWAS) method.
    Kong R; Spanier J
    Monte Carlo Methods Appl; 2016 Sep; 22(3):161-196. PubMed ID: 29033498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dilemma of negative analysis of variance estimators of intraclass correlation.
    Wang CS; Yandell BS; Rutledge JJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 1992 Oct; 85(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 24197232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferring admixture proportions from molecular data.
    Bertorelle G; Excoffier L
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Oct; 15(10):1298-311. PubMed ID: 9787436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.