These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36339521)

  • 21. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.
    Akcan S; Güldeş M
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():5614892. PubMed ID: 31687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.
    Tripathi AK; Agrawal S; Gupta RD
    GeoJournal; 2022; 87(5):3507-3528. PubMed ID: 34075269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multi-criteria decision making based on induced generalized interval neutrosophic Choquet integral.
    Jiao Y; Wang L; Liu J; Ma G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242449. PubMed ID: 33259510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An application of the hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE approach to evaluate the severity of the factors influencing road accidents.
    Trivedi P; Shah J; Moslem S; Pilla F
    Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e21187. PubMed ID: 37928046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A modified VIKOR method for multiple criteria analysis.
    Chang CL
    Environ Monit Assess; 2010 Sep; 168(1-4):339-44. PubMed ID: 19672684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multi-criteria decision-making for coronavirus disease 2019 applications: a theoretical analysis review.
    Alsalem MA; Alamoodi AH; Albahri OS; Dawood KA; Mohammed RT; Alnoor A; Zaidan AA; Albahri AS; Zaidan BB; Jumaah FM; Al-Obaidi JR
    Artif Intell Rev; 2022; 55(6):4979-5062. PubMed ID: 35103030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Clustering Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Large-Scale Discrete and Continuous Uncertain Evaluation.
    Wang S; Ma W; Zhan J
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Nov; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 36359711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach to compare types of classroom furniture considering mismatches for anthropometric measures of university students.
    Khoshabi P; Nejati E; Ahmadi SF; Chegini A; Makui A; Ghousi R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239297. PubMed ID: 32941538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. COVID-19 safe campus evaluation for universities by a hybrid interval type-2 fuzzy decision-making model.
    Baskak D; Ozbey S; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):8133-8153. PubMed ID: 36056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A decision analysis model for material selection using simple ranking process.
    Zakeri S; Chatterjee P; Konstantas D; Ecer F
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8631. PubMed ID: 37244904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MCDM analysis of wind energy in Turkey: decision making based on environmental impact.
    Değirmenci S; Bingöl F; Sofuoglu SC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jul; 25(20):19753-19766. PubMed ID: 29736652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard.
    Wu HY; Lin YK; Chang CH
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 20619892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic Review of an Automated Multiclass Detection and Classification System for Acute Leukaemia in Terms of Evaluation and Benchmarking, Open Challenges, Issues and Methodological Aspects.
    Alsalem MA; Zaidan AA; Zaidan BB; Hashim M; Albahri OS; Albahri AS; Hadi A; Mohammed KI
    J Med Syst; 2018 Sep; 42(11):204. PubMed ID: 30232632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms.
    Altubaishe B; Desai S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
    C S; Subramaniam SK
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multi-criteria decision making of COVID-19 vaccines (in India) based on ranking interpreter technique under single valued bipolar neutrosophic environment.
    Garai T; Garg H
    Expert Syst Appl; 2022 Dec; 208():118160. PubMed ID: 35873110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.