136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36340863)
1. A comparison of design-based and model-based approaches for finite population spatial sampling and inference.
Dumelle M; Higham M; Hoef JMV; Olsen AR; Madsen L
Methods Ecol Evol; 2022 Sep; 13(9):2018-2029. PubMed ID: 36340863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. spsurvey: Spatial Sampling Design and Analysis in R.
Dumelle M; Kincaid T; Olsen AR; Weber M
J Stat Softw; 2023 Jan; 105(3):1-29. PubMed ID: 36798141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A spatially balanced design with probability function proportional to the within sample distance.
Benedetti R; Piersimoni F
Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):1067-1084. PubMed ID: 28508431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Application of Spatio-temporal Modeling to Finite Population Abundance Prediction.
Higham M; Dumelle M; Hammond C; Ver Hoef J; Wells J
J Agric Biol Environ Stat; 2023 Aug; 28(3):1-25. PubMed ID: 37844016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatially balanced sampling designs for environmental surveys.
Kermorvant C; D'Amico F; Bru N; Caill-Milly N; Robertson B
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jul; 191(8):524. PubMed ID: 31363924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced Inference for Finite Population Sampling-Based Prevalence Estimation with Misclassification Errors.
Ge L; Zhang Y; Waller LA; Lyles RH
Am Stat; 2024; 78(2):192-198. PubMed ID: 38645436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active regional surveillance for early detection of exotic/emerging pathogens of swine: A comparison of statistical methods for farm selection.
Hu D; Cheng TY; Morris P; Zimmerman J; Wang C
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Feb; 187():105233. PubMed ID: 33373958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing for an ignorable sampling bias under random double truncation.
de Uña-Álvarez J
Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3732-3744. PubMed ID: 37312237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trend estimation for complex survey designs of water chemistry indicators from Sierra Nevada Lakes.
Starcevich LAH; McDonald T; Chung-MacCoubrey A; Heard A; Nesmith J; Philippi T
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Sep; 190(10):596. PubMed ID: 30232629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation After a Group Sequential Trial.
Milanzi E; Molenberghs G; Alonso A; Kenward MG; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Verbeke G
Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 26478751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving inference for aerial surveys of bears: The importance of assumptions and the cost of unnecessary complexity.
Schmidt JH; Wilson TL; Thompson WL; Reynolds JH
Ecol Evol; 2017 Jul; 7(13):4812-4821. PubMed ID: 28690810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On random sample size, ignorability, ancillarity, completeness, separability, and degeneracy: sequential trials, random sample sizes, and missing data.
Molenberghs G; Kenward MG; Aerts M; Verbeke G; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Rizopoulos D
Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):11-41. PubMed ID: 22514029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design-based random permutation models with auxiliary information
Li W; Stanek EJ; Singer JM
Statistics (Ber); 2012 Jan; 46(5):663-671. PubMed ID: 23645951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inference under unequal probability sampling with the Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood.
Yiu A; Goudie RJB; Tom BDM
Biometrika; 2020 Dec; 107(4):857-873. PubMed ID: 34992304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Including a spatial predictive process in band recovery models improves inference for Lincoln estimates of animal abundance.
Gonnerman M; Linden DW; Shea SA; Sullivan K; Kamath P; Blomberg E
Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9444. PubMed ID: 36311403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sampling and kriging spatial means: efficiency and conditions.
Wang JF; Li LF; Christakos G
Sensors (Basel); 2009; 9(7):5224-40. PubMed ID: 22346694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing Models and Measurements of Traffic-Related Air Pollutants for Health Studies Using Dispersion Modeling and Bayesian Data Fusion.
Batterman S; Berrocal VJ; Milando C; Gilani O; Arunachalam S; Zhang KM
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2020 Mar; 2020(202):1-63. PubMed ID: 32239871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shrinkage estimators for covariance matrices.
Daniels MJ; Kass RE
Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1173-84. PubMed ID: 11764258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
