BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36342217)

  • 1. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening.
    Tran-Nguyen VK; Jacquemard C; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4263-4273. PubMed ID: 32282202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TocoDecoy: A New Approach to Design Unbiased Datasets for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Liao B; Jiang D; Wang J; Wu Z; Du H; Wang T; Huo W; Xu L; Cao D; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    J Med Chem; 2022 Jun; 65(11):7918-7932. PubMed ID: 35642777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.
    Yang C; Chen EA; Zhang Y
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards Effective Consensus Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Nhat Phuong D; Flower DR; Chattopadhyay S; Chattopadhyay AK
    Interdiscip Sci; 2023 Mar; 15(1):131-145. PubMed ID: 36550341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Ericksen SS; Wu H; Zhang H; Michael LA; Newton MA; Hoffmann FM; Wildman SA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1579-1590. PubMed ID: 28654262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PharmRF: A machine-learning scoring function to identify the best protein-ligand complexes for structure-based pharmacophore screening with high enrichments.
    Kumar SP; Dixit NY; Patel CN; Rawal RM; Pandya HA
    J Comput Chem; 2022 May; 43(12):847-863. PubMed ID: 35301752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):2074-2089. PubMed ID: 33724022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
    Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
    Yang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual Screening with Gnina 1.0.
    Sunseri J; Koes DR
    Molecules; 2021 Dec; 26(23):. PubMed ID: 34885952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DSDP: A Blind Docking Strategy Accelerated by GPUs.
    Huang Y; Zhang H; Jiang S; Yue D; Lin X; Zhang J; Gao YQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jul; 63(14):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 37386792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
    Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FRAGSITE2: A structure and fragment-based approach for virtual ligand screening.
    Zhou H; Skolnick J
    Protein Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e4869. PubMed ID: 38100293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive Survey of Consensus Docking for High-Throughput Virtual Screening.
    Blanes-Mira C; Fernández-Aguado P; de Andrés-López J; Fernández-Carvajal A; Ferrer-Montiel A; Fernández-Ballester G
    Molecules; 2022 Dec; 28(1):. PubMed ID: 36615367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine Learning Scoring Functions for Drug Discovery from Experimental and Computer-Generated Protein-Ligand Structures: Towards Per-Target Scoring Functions.
    Pellicani F; Dal Ben D; Perali A; Pilati S
    Molecules; 2023 Feb; 28(4):. PubMed ID: 36838647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.