These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3634249)

  • 1. When can a nurse refuse to give care?
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Mar; 17(3):16-20. PubMed ID: 3634249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Warthen v. Toms River Community Memorial Hospital.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 11644049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No code orders: guidelines for policy.
    Kellmer DM
    Nurs Outlook; 1986; 34(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 3637781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discharge of professional employees: protecting against dismissal for acts within a professional code of ethics.
    Feliu AG
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1979-1980 Fall-Winter; 11(2):149-87. PubMed ID: 11658452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The corporate practice of medicine doctrine: an anachronism in the modern health care industry.
    Chase-Lubitz JF
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 40(2):445-88. PubMed ID: 11649888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimentation and research.
    Annas GJ
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
    Shapiro RS; Barthel R
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
    Lund N
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
    Glick HR
    West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When employer and employee disagree.
    Weinstein BD
    US Pharm; 1991 May; 16(5):80-1. PubMed ID: 11652258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining the employment rights of medical personnel within the parameters of personal conscience.
    Davis BG
    Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1986; 90(3):847-78. PubMed ID: 11655897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The legal status of clinical and ethics policies, codes, and guidelines in medical practice and research.
    Campbell A; Glass KC
    McGill Law J; 2001 Feb; 46(2):473-89. PubMed ID: 16523580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment.
    Murphy CA
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To bear or not to bear: reproductive freedom as an international human right.
    Hernández BE
    Brooklyn J Int Law; 1991; 17(2):309-58. PubMed ID: 11656131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
    Quinn KP
    Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conscience in conflict: the doctor's dilemma.
    Hampson FJ
    Can Yearb Int Law; 1989; 27():203-25. PubMed ID: 11651107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rightful position in "wrongful life" actions.
    Kelly MB
    Hastings Law J; 1991 Jan; 42(2):505-90. PubMed ID: 11659410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
    Murphy JJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
    Longino PH
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.