These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36343508)

  • 21. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
    Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inverse effectiveness and multisensory interactions in visual event-related potentials with audiovisual speech.
    Stevenson RA; Bushmakin M; Kim S; Wallace MT; Puce A; James TW
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jul; 25(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 22367585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory-visual processing represented in the human superior temporal gyrus.
    Reale RA; Calvert GA; Thesen T; Jenison RL; Kawasaki H; Oya H; Howard MA; Brugge JF
    Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 17241747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hari R; Möttönen R; Rauschecker JP; Sams M
    J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(4):1314-21. PubMed ID: 20107058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
    Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The contribution of dynamic visual cues to audiovisual speech perception.
    Jaekl P; Pesquita A; Alsius A; Munhall K; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():402-10. PubMed ID: 26100561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual prediction cues can facilitate behavioural and neural speech processing in young and older adults.
    Tremblay P; Basirat A; Pinto S; Sato M
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Aug; 159():107949. PubMed ID: 34228997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex.
    Möttönen R; Krause CM; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 May; 13(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 11919005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The whole is more than the sum of its parts - audiovisual processing of phonemes investigated with ERPs.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Stowe L; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23395711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.
    Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multisensory integration of speech sounds with letters vs. visual speech: only visual speech induces the mismatch negativity.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 May; 47(9):1135-1145. PubMed ID: 29537657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Seeing and hearing rotated faces: influences of facial orientation on visual and audiovisual speech recognition.
    Jordan TR; Bevan K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Apr; 23(2):388-403. PubMed ID: 9104001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing visual modulation along the human subcortical auditory pathway.
    Caron-Desrochers L; Schönwiesner M; Focke K; Lehmann A
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Oct; 685():12-17. PubMed ID: 30009874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise alters beta-band activity in superior temporal cortex during audiovisual speech processing.
    Schepers IM; Schneider TR; Hipp JF; Engel AK; Senkowski D
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():101-12. PubMed ID: 23274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.