These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36343727)

  • 1. A cognitive task, deep breathing, and static stretching reduce variability of motor evoked potentials during subsequent transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Cleland B; Pradhan S; Madhavan S
    Brain Res; 2023 Jan; 1798():148151. PubMed ID: 36343727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials.
    Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 1700():190-198. PubMed ID: 30194017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of voluntary control of respiration on the excitability of the primary motor hand area, evaluated by end-tidal CO2 monitoring.
    Ozaki I; Kurata K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2162-9. PubMed ID: 25698305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Covariation of the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a resting hand muscle.
    Vallence AM; Rurak BK; Fujiyama H; Hammond GR
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):927-936. PubMed ID: 36811686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
    Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
    Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Near-threshold recruitment characteristics of motor evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Demjan M; Säisänen L; Reijonen J; Rissanen S; Määttä S; Julkunen P
    Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 1805():148284. PubMed ID: 36796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of posture and coactivation on corticomotor excitability of ankle muscles.
    Kesar TM; Eicholtz S; Lin BJ; Wolf SL; Borich MR
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(1):131-146. PubMed ID: 29439363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Cortex Evaluated by Different TMS Waveforms and Current Directions.
    Davila-Pérez P; Pascual-Leone A; Cudeiro J
    Neuroscience; 2019 Aug; 413():22-30. PubMed ID: 31195056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury.
    Diehl P; Kliesch U; Dietz V; Curt A
    J Neurol; 2006 Jan; 253(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16044213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiological processes influencing motor-evoked potential duration with voluntary contraction.
    van den Bos MA; Geevasinga N; Menon P; Burke D; Kiernan MC; Vucic S
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1156-1162. PubMed ID: 28031404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of low-frequency whole-body vibration on motor-evoked potentials in healthy men.
    Mileva KN; Bowtell JL; Kossev AR
    Exp Physiol; 2009 Jan; 94(1):103-16. PubMed ID: 18658234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-stimulus theta power is correlated with variation of motor evoked potential latency: a single-pulse TMS study.
    İşcan Z; Schurger A; Vernet M; Sitt JD; Valero-Cabré A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):3003-3014. PubMed ID: 30116864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced corticospinal excitability in the tibialis anterior during static stretching of the soleus in young healthy individuals.
    Budini F; Christova M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284289. PubMed ID: 37040389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corticomotor plasticity and learning of a ballistic thumb training task are diminished in older adults.
    Rogasch NC; Dartnall TJ; Cirillo J; Nordstrom MA; Semmler JG
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2009 Dec; 107(6):1874-83. PubMed ID: 19833810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-related enhancement in corticomotor excitability during haptic sensing with the contra- or ipsilateral hand in young and senior adults.
    Master S; Tremblay F
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 13():27. PubMed ID: 22416786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of different transcranial magnetic stimulation current directions on the corticomotor control of lumbar erector spinae muscles during a static task.
    Desmons M; Rohel A; Desgagnés A; Mercier C; Massé-Alarie H
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Oct; 126(4):1276-1288. PubMed ID: 34550037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities.
    Schaworonkow N; Triesch J; Ziemann U; Zrenner C
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 30268710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neck rotation modulates motor-evoked potential duration of proximal muscle cortical representations in healthy adults.
    McCambridge AB; Hay K; Levin K; Philpott K; Wood K; Bradnam LV
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Nov; 238(11):2531-2538. PubMed ID: 32862278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-specific increase in corticomotor excitability during tactile discrimination.
    Master S; Tremblay F
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 194(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 19104788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.