BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36343845)

  • 1. Hybrid and Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Esaki M; Ihara E; Sumida Y; Fujii H; Takahashi S; Haraguchi K; Iwasa T; Somada S; Minoda Y; Ogino H; Tagawa K; Ogawa Y
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Jul; 21(7):1810-1818.e8. PubMed ID: 36343845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).
    Esaki M; Ihara E; Fujii H; Sumida Y; Haraguchi K; Takahashi S; Iwasa T; Nakano K; Wada M; Somada S; Minoda Y; Ogino H; Tagawa K; Ogawa Y
    Trials; 2022 Feb; 23(1):166. PubMed ID: 35189939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with SOUTEN in gastric lesions: An
    Esaki M; Ihara E; Hashimoto N; Abe S; Aratono C; Shiga N; Sumida Y; Fujii H; Haraguchi K; Takahashi S; Iwasa T; Nakano K; Wada M; Somada S; Nishioka K; Minoda Y; Ogino H; Ogawa Y
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(6):563-573. PubMed ID: 34194614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safe and effective hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with ALL IN ONE snare in porcine gastric model (with video).
    Yang L; Ma XZ; Su H; Zhang J; Sheng JQ; Jin P
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10060. PubMed ID: 38698246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kinoshita J; Iguchi M; Maekita T; Wan K; Shimokawa T; Fukatsu K; Ito D; Taki S; Nishimoto M; Takao M; Tabata Y; Mukai Y; Kitano M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Apr; 101(13):e29172. PubMed ID: 35421071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hemostatic ability between spray coagulation and forced coagulation modes in endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial (Spray-G trial).
    Maehara K; Esaki M; Sumida Y; Yamaguchi D; Nishioka K; Homma H; Inada T; Shiotsuki K; Fukuda SI; Akiho H; Nomura T; Mizuta Y; Ishida S; Fujimoto S; Kimura S; Tanaka Y; Hata K; Shiga N; Iwasa T; Kimura Y; Nakamura N; Suzuki Y; Minoda Y; Hata Y; Ogino H; Tagawa K; Ihara E; Ogawa Y
    Trials; 2024 Jan; 25(1):53. PubMed ID: 38225659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability of Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using Multifunctional Snare for Small-sized Gastric Neoplasms: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Chiyo T; Kobara H; Nishiyama N; Nakatani K; Tada N; Koduka K; Matsui T; Kobayashi N; Fujihara S; Yachida T; Masaki T
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2022 Dec; 31(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 36535049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction in the procedure time of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: a multi-center retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.
    Esaki M; Suzuki S; Horii T; Ichijima R; Yamakawa S; Shibuya H; Kusano C; Ikehara H; Gotoda T
    Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2020; 13():1756284820939420. PubMed ID: 32821288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a multifunctional snare: a prospective clinical feasibility study (with videos).
    Arimoto J; Ohata K; Chiba H; Tachikawa J; Okada N; Kuwabara H; Nakaoka M; Ashikari K; Ishii R; Minato Y; Takita M; Sakai E; Muramoto T; Matsuhashi N; Goto T; Nakajima A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Mar; 93(3):671-678. PubMed ID: 32950596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Neoplasia of the Greater Curvature of the Upper and Middle Stomach: J-shaped Superficial Cutting and Splashed Dissection.
    Nishiyama N; Kobara H; Fujihara S; Koduka K; Chiyo T; Kobayashi N; Fujita K; Ayaki M; Yachida T; Tani J; Shi T; Okano K; Suzuki Y; Mori H; Masaki T
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2019 Dec; 28(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31826062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].
    Rong L; Cai Y; Nian W; Wang X; Liang J; He Y; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 21(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 29492919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water-pocket endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasms (with video).
    Harada H; Murakami D; Suehiro S; Nakahara R; Ujihara T; Sagami R; Katsuyama Y; Hayasaka K; Amano Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 29660320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Zhang YX; Liu X; Gu F; Ding SG
    Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(3):949-960. PubMed ID: 38218733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection in a country with a low incidence of gastric cancer: Results from a prospective national registry.
    Fernández-Esparrach G; Marín-Gabriel JC; de Tejada AH; Albéniz E; Nogales O; Del Pozo-García AJ; Rosón PJ; Goicotxea U; Uchima H; Terán A; Alberto A; Joaquín RS; Liseth RS; José S;
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2021 Jul; 9(6):718-726. PubMed ID: 34077636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized controlled trial comparing submucosal endoscopy with mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the esophagus and stomach: Animal study.
    Takizawa K; Knipschield MA; Gostout CJ
    Dig Endosc; 2018 Jan; 30(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 28664661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy, safety, and advantages of magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection: A retrospective paired cohort study.
    Li J; Lu G; Yin Y; Lu X; Ma F; Lv Y; He S; Ren M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Apr; 28(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 38583889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Niu C; Zhang J; Vallabhajosyula S; E-Xin B; Napel M; Okolo PI
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2024 Mar; 55(1):129-142. PubMed ID: 37953438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of the combined orthodontic rubber band and clip method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Li D; Zheng L; Zhang Z; Chen L; Jiang C; Wang R; Lin J; Lu Y; Bai Y; Wang W
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):527. PubMed ID: 36528595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and safety of an internal magnet traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: ex vivo study in a porcine model (with video).
    Dobashi A; Storm AC; Wong Kee Song LM; Gostout CJ; Deters JL; Miller CA; Knipschield MA; Rajan E
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):663-668. PubMed ID: 30353242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with conversion to snare resection during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
    Kim SJ; Choi CW; Nam HS; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Ryu DG
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1585-1591. PubMed ID: 31209610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.