191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36343921)
1. Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Merboth F; Nebelung H; Wotschel N; Liebscher H; Eckert F; von Renesse J; Hasanovic J; Welsch T; Fritzmann J; Stange DE; Plodeck V; Hoffmann RT; Distler M; Weitz J; Kirchberg J
J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):232-244. PubMed ID: 36343921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.
Babic B; Müller DT; Jung JO; Schiffmann LM; Grisar P; Schmidt T; Chon SH; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7747-7755. PubMed ID: 35505259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy - a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques.
Grimminger PP; Staubitz JI; Perez D; Ghadban T; Reeh M; Scognamiglio P; Izbicki JR; Biebl M; Fuchs H; Bruns CJ; Lang H; Becker T; Egberts JH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Oct; 25(10):2463-2469. PubMed ID: 34145494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term survival outcomes associated with robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
Byiringiro I; Aurit SJ; Nandipati KC
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):4018-4027. PubMed ID: 36097100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Capovilla G; Hadzijusufovic E; Tagkalos E; Froiio C; Berlth F; Mann C; Staubitz J; Uzun E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Aug; 35(8):. PubMed ID: 34979549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy Leads to Significant Reduction in Postoperative Acute Pain: A Retrospective Clinical Trial.
Hoelzen JP; Sander KJ; Sesia M; Roy D; Rijcken E; Schnabel A; Struecker B; Juratli MA; Pascher A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 29(12):7498-7509. PubMed ID: 35854033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
