These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36344773)

  • 1. PHOR-in-One: A multilingual lexical database with PHonological, ORthographic and PHonographic word similarity estimates in four languages.
    Costa AS; Comesaña M; Soares AP
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3699-3725. PubMed ID: 36344773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The phonographic language network: Using network science to investigate the phonological and orthographic similarity structure of language.
    Siew CSQ; Vitevitch MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):475-500. PubMed ID: 30802126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): A Web-based interface for a new European Portuguese lexical database.
    Soares AP; Iriarte Á; de Almeida JJ; Simões A; Costa A; Machado J; França P; Comesaña M; Rauber A; Rato A; Perea M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1461-1481. PubMed ID: 29855811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthography-Induced Length Contrasts in the Second Language Phonological Systems of L2 Speakers of English: Evidence from Minimal Pairs.
    Bassetti B; Sokolović-Perović M; Mairano P; Cerni T
    Lang Speech; 2018 Dec; 61(4):577-597. PubMed ID: 29914283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multilingual English-Mandarin-Malay phonological error patterns: An initial cross-sectional study of 2 to 4 years old Malaysian Chinese children.
    Lim HW
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2018; 32(10):889-912. PubMed ID: 29993293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-linguistic similarity norms for Japanese-English translation equivalents.
    Allen D; Conklin K
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):540-63. PubMed ID: 24046264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facilitative effect of cognate words vanishes when reducing the orthographic overlap: The role of stimuli list composition.
    Comesaña M; Ferré P; Romero J; Guasch M; Soares AP; García-Chico T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):614-35. PubMed ID: 25329085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breaking Down the Bilingual Cost in Speech Production.
    Sadat J; Martin CD; Magnuson JS; Alario FX; Costa A
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 40(8):1911-1940. PubMed ID: 26498431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automaticity of lexical access in deaf and hearing bilinguals: Cross-linguistic evidence from the color Stroop task across five languages.
    Bosworth RG; Binder EM; Tyler SC; Morford JP
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104659. PubMed ID: 33798950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of phonological and orthographic similarity on L2 word recognition across modalities in bilinguals.
    Frances C; Navarra-Barindelli E; Martin CD
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):12812. PubMed ID: 34140594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthographic influences on spoken word recognition in bilinguals are dependent on the orthographic depth of the target language not the native language.
    Türk S; Domahs U
    Brain Lang; 2022 Dec; 235():105186. PubMed ID: 36240536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages.
    Dong J; Li A; Chen C; Qu J; Jiang N; Sun Y; Hu L; Mei L
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):893-907. PubMed ID: 33112483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CLEARPOND: cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities.
    Marian V; Bartolotti J; Chabal S; Shook A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43230. PubMed ID: 22916227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prime-masked ERP investigation on phonology in visual word processing among bilingual speakers of alphasyllabic and alphabetic orthographies.
    Shetty A; Hebbar SP; Shenoy R; Peter V; Krishnan G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9870. PubMed ID: 35701449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic phonological activation during visual word recognition in bilingual children: A cross-language masked priming study in grades 3 and 5.
    Sauval K; Perre L; Duncan LG; Marinus E; Casalis S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Feb; 154():64-77. PubMed ID: 27835754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.
    Marian V; Blumenfeld HK; Boukrina OV
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2008 May; 37(3):141-70. PubMed ID: 18041587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-linguistic similarity and task demands in Japanese-English bilingual processing.
    Allen DB; Conklin K
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72631. PubMed ID: 24015266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaker Accent Modulates the Effects of Orthographic and Phonological Similarity on Auditory Processing by Learners of English.
    Frances C; Navarra-Barindelli E; Martin CD
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():892822. PubMed ID: 35664165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognates are advantaged over non-cognates in early bilingual expressive vocabulary development.
    Mitchell L; Tsui RK; Byers-Heinlein K
    J Child Lang; 2024 May; 51(3):596-615. PubMed ID: 38087835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise Modulates Crosslinguistic Effects on Second-Language Auditory Word Recognition.
    Guediche S; Navarra-Barindelli E; Martin CD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 66(2):635-647. PubMed ID: 36729589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.