BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36344895)

  • 1. Modern trends in minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP.
    Carpenter EL; Thomas KK; Adams AM; Valdera FA; Chick RC; Kemp Bohan PM; Spitzer HV; Clifton GT; Bader JO; Nelson DW; Vreeland TJ
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5591-5602. PubMed ID: 36344895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends and Outcomes of Synchronous Resection of Colorectal Metastasis in the Modern Era-Analysis of Targeted Hepatic NSQIP Database.
    Jones TJ; Murphy AE; Tameron A; Hussain LR; Grannan K; Guend H; Dunki-Jacobs EM; Lee DY
    J Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 238():35-40. PubMed ID: 30735964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases reduces postoperative morbidity while maintaining equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to non-parenchymal-sparing resection.
    Andreou A; Gloor S; Inglin J; Di Pietro Martinelli C; Banz V; Lachenmayer A; Kim-Fuchs C; Candinas D; Beldi G
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101631. PubMed ID: 34298267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parenchymal-Sparing Versus Anatomic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review.
    Moris D; Ronnekleiv-Kelly S; Rahnemai-Azar AA; Felekouras E; Dillhoff M; Schmidt C; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(6):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28364212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for the resection of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ozair A; Collings A; Adams AM; Dirks R; Kushner BS; Sucandy I; Morrell D; Abou-Setta AM; Vreeland T; Whiteside J; Cloyd JM; Ansari MT; Cleary SP; Ceppa E; Richardson W; Alseidi A; Awad Z; Ayloo S; Buell JF; Orthopoulos G; Sbayi S; Wakabayashi G; Slater BJ; Pryor A; Jeyarajah DR
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):7915-7937. PubMed ID: 36138246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SAGES/AHPBA guidelines for the use of minimally invasive surgery for the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
    Vreeland TJ; Collings AT; Ozair A; Adams AM; Dirks R; Kushner BS; Sucandy I; Morrell D; Whiteside J; Ansari MT; Cloyd J; Cleary SP; Ceppa E; Abou-Setta AM; Alseidi A; Awad Z; Ayloo S; Buell J; Orthopoulos G; Richardson W; Sbayi S; Wakabayashi G; Asbun H; Slater BJ; Pryor AD; Jeyarajah DR
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2508-2516. PubMed ID: 36810687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedure-specific risks of robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.
    Radomski SN; Chen SY; Stem M; Done JZ; Atallah C; Safar B; Efron JE; Gabre-Kidan A
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2555-2558. PubMed ID: 37436675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thirty-Day Morbidity after Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Liver Metastasis: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis.
    Snyder RA; Hao S; Irish W; Zervos EE; Tuttle-Newhall JE; Parikh AA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Apr; 230(4):617-627.e9. PubMed ID: 32007534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined Ablation and Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Era.
    Vandeputte M; Saveyn T; Lutin B; De Meyere C; Parmentier I; D'Hondt M
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2023 Apr; 33(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 36821654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases-a propensity score matching analysis].
    Bao Q; Wang K; Wang HW; Jin KM; Xing BC
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 23(10):976-983. PubMed ID: 33053993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes.
    Efanov M; Granov D; Alikhanov R; Rutkin I; Tsvirkun V; Kazakov I; Vankovich A; Koroleva A; Kovalenko D
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 31932927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.
    Li J; Xi H; Cui J; Zhang K; Gao Y; Liang W; Cai A; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1422-1433. PubMed ID: 29075971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Cost Comparing Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver and Pancreatic Surgery.
    Okunrintemi V; Gani F; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Nov; 20(11):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27613735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is minimally invasive surgery of lesions in the right superior segments of the liver justified? A multi-institutional study of 245 patients.
    Gholami S; Judge SJ; Lee SY; Mashayekhi K; Goh BKP; Chan CY; Nuño MA; Gönen M; Balachandran VP; Allen PJ; Drebin JA; Jarnagin WR; D' Angelica MI; Kingham TP
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 122(7):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 33459363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy for deep-placed colorectal liver metastases.
    Matsuki R; Mise Y; Saiura A; Inoue Y; Ishizawa T; Takahashi Y
    Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 27521044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes.
    Nguyen KT; Laurent A; Dagher I; Geller DA; Steel J; Thomas MT; Marvin M; Ravindra KV; Mejia A; Lainas P; Franco D; Cherqui D; Buell JF; Gamblin TC
    Ann Surg; 2009 Nov; 250(5):842-8. PubMed ID: 19806058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Approaches for Major or Challenging Hepatectomy.
    Thornblade LW; Shi X; Ruiz A; Flum DR; Park JO
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):851-861. PubMed ID: 28163089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Bagante F; Spolverato G; Strasberg SM; Gani F; Thompson V; Hall BL; Bentrem DJ; Pitt HA; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27412321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy for Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Improves Outcomes and Salvageability: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Okumura S; Tabchouri N; Leung U; Tinguely P; Louvet C; Beaussier M; Gayet B; Fuks D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4576-4586. PubMed ID: 31605335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.
    Chen Q; Merath K; Bagante F; Akgul O; Dillhoff M; Cloyd J; Pawlik TM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(12):2088-2096. PubMed ID: 30039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.