These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36345212)

  • 61. Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms.
    Biegała M; Jakubowska T; Stępińska A; Woźniak P
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Jun; 46(2):897-902. PubMed ID: 37185808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Digital skeletal radiography. Reduction of absorbed dose by adaptation of exposure factors and image processing.
    Axelsson B; Petersen U; Wiltz HJ
    Acta Radiol; 2001 Nov; 42(6):592-8. PubMed ID: 11736707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.
    Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of cassette-based digital radiography detectors using standardized image quality metrics: AAPM TG-150 Draft Image Detector Tests.
    Li G; Greene TC; Nishino TK; Willis CE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):391-417. PubMed ID: 27685102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index.
    Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography.
    Mora P; Pfeiffer D; Zhang G; Bosmans H; Delis H; Razi Z; Arreola M; Tsapaki V
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):126-142. PubMed ID: 34623023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Image quality assessment using the CD-DISC phantom for vascular radiology and vascular surgery.
    Struelens L; Hambach L; Buls N; Smans K; Malchair F; Hoornaert MT; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 17826937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Optimisation of radiological protocols for chest imaging using computed radiography and flat-panel X-ray detectors.
    Compagnone G; Casadio Baleni M; Di Nicola E; Valentino M; Benati M; Calzolaio LF; Oberhofer N; Fabbri E; Domenichelli S; Barozzi L
    Radiol Med; 2013 Jun; 118(4):540-54. PubMed ID: 23090253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
    Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
    Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [Effect of Gonadal Protection on Image Quality in Frontal Hip Radiography].
    Ito T; Kawabata T; Onodera S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2024 Mar; 80(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 38311431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand.
    Techavipoo U; Sinsuebphon N; Prompalit S; Thongvigitmanee S; Narkbuakaew W; Kiang-Ia A; Srivongsa T; Thajchayapong P; Chaumrattanakul U
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3102673. PubMed ID: 34869760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics.
    Rojas LJ; Fausto AMF; Mol AW; Velasco FG; Abreu POS; Henriques G; Furquim TAC
    Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():13-18. PubMed ID: 29173906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.
    Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Otsuka T; Suzuki S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24234736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.