These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36346490)

  • 1. Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee JG; Lee SP; Jang HJ; Kae SH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Apr; 68(4):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 36346490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors ≤20 mm: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
    Yin Z; Li J; Yang W; Huang W; Xu D; Lei X; Zhang J
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):928-936. PubMed ID: 36084162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤20mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lv XH; Luo R; Lu Q; Deng K; Yang JL
    Dig Liver Dis; 2023 Jun; 55(6):714-720. PubMed ID: 36195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal injection and marking' for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors to achieve R0 resection: a single-center case series.
    Hashiguchi K; Yamaguchi N; Shiota J; Akashi T; Ogihara K; Tabuchi M; Kitayama M; Matsushima K; Akazawa Y; Ohnita K; Nakao K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jul; 58(7):813-821. PubMed ID: 36708197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can underwater endoscopic mucosal resection be an alternative to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors?
    Tanaka H; Urabe Y; Takemoto H; Ishibashi K; Konishi H; Matsubara Y; Takehara Y; Morimoto S; Tanino F; Yamamoto N; Teshima H; Mizuno J; Hirata I; Tamari H; Tsuboi A; Yamashita K; Kotachi T; Takigawa H; Yuge R; Oka S
    DEN Open; 2024 Apr; 4(1):e312. PubMed ID: 37927952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumor.
    Furukawa M; Mitoro A; Ozutumi T; Fujinaga Y; Nakanishi K; Kitagawa K; Saikawa S; Sato S; Sawada Y; Takaya H; Kaji K; Kawaratani H; Namisaki T; Moriya K; Akahane T; Yamao J; Yoshiji H
    Clin Endosc; 2021 May; 54(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 33596634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current Status of Endoscopic Resection for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.
    Yamasaki Y; Uedo N; Takeuchi Y; Ishihara R; Okada H; Iishi H
    Digestion; 2018; 97(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29393159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of partial injection underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumor: Propensity score-matched study (with video).
    Takatori Y; Kato M; Masunaga T; Kubosawa Y; Mizutani M; Kiguchi Y; Matsuura N; Nakayama A; Yahagi N
    Dig Endosc; 2022 Mar; 34(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34370891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility study comparing underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor < 20 mm.
    Kiguchi Y; Kato M; Nakayama A; Sasaki M; Mizutani M; Tsutsumi K; Akimoto T; Takatori Y; Mutaguchi M; Takabayashi K; Ochiai Y; Maehata T; Kanai T; Yahagi N
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):753-760. PubMed ID: 31498932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≤20 mm superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu J; Duan S; Wang Y; Peng H; Kong Y; Yao S
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():1077806. PubMed ID: 36687419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3003-3013. PubMed ID: 32577813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility Study of Partial Submucosal Injection Technique Combining Underwater EMR for Superficial Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.
    Takatori Y; Kato M; Masunaga T; Kubosawa Y; Mizutani M; Kiguchi Y; Matsuura N; Nakayama A; Maehata T; Yahagi N
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(3):971-977. PubMed ID: 33723697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and management of residues for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial neoplasms.
    Iwagami H; Takeuchi Y; Yamasaki Y; Nakagawa K; Ohmori M; Matsuno K; Inoue S; Iwatsubo T; Nakahira H; Matsuura N; Shichijo S; Maekawa A; Kanesaka T; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R
    Dig Endosc; 2020 May; 32(4):565-573. PubMed ID: 31550394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.