These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36349714)

  • 1. Information interference and loss in a dual task situation: Task 1, choice reaction time; Task 2, unspeeded recall.
    Hartley AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2208-2225. PubMed ID: 36349714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrodermal responses to sources of dual-task interference.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F; Brooks RD; Festini SB; Frazier K
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):543-56. PubMed ID: 22552962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?
    Jung KH; Martin T; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 32020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.
    Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101583. PubMed ID: 37429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attentional boost effect overcomes dual-task interference in choice-response tasks.
    Lee VG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2241-2255. PubMed ID: 36717536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual task interference on early perceptual processing.
    Duncan J; Roberge A; Fortier-Gauthier U; Fiset D; Blais C; Brisson B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1777-1795. PubMed ID: 33083993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The control of stimulus-driven saccades is subject not to central, but to visual attention limitations.
    Carbone E; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2168-75. PubMed ID: 21097860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.
    Janczyk M; Berryhill ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 24452383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.