These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36349714)

  • 21. Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.
    Janczyk M; Berryhill ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 24452383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence against decay in verbal working memory.
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):380-411. PubMed ID: 22866686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation.
    Dell'Acqua R; Turatto M; Jolicoeur P
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):777-89. PubMed ID: 11521846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 17343714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Isolating component processes of posterror slowing with the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Steinhauser M; Ernst B; Ibald KW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 27709985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The working memory costs of a central attentional bottleneck in multitasking.
    Otermans PCJ; Parton A; Szameitat AJ
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1774-1791. PubMed ID: 34751812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selection and consolidation of objects and actions.
    Hommel B; Doeller CF
    Psychol Res; 2005 Jan; 69(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 15597181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: a dual-task approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):695-725. PubMed ID: 11548031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The psychological refractory period in Parkinson's disease.
    Hsieh S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):893-902. PubMed ID: 11153866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing.
    Allen PA; Smith AF; Vires-Collins H; Sperry S
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Jun; 13(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 9640583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?
    Ruthruff E; Johnston JC; Van Selst M; Whitsell S; Remington R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):280-9. PubMed ID: 12760615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.