BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3635057)

  • 1. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests.
    Streiner DL
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 14638445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proteomics and cancer: running before we can walk?
    Check E
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):496-7. PubMed ID: 15175721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of a diagnostic test].
    Nendaz MR; Perrier A
    Rev Mal Respir; 2004 Apr; 21(2 Pt 1):390-3. PubMed ID: 15211250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A testing question.
    Buchan H; Gray M; Hill A; Coulter A
    Health Serv J; 1990 Mar; 100(5190):328-9. PubMed ID: 10103970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are some screening tests doing more harm than good?
    Lin KW; Duane MR
    Am Fam Physician; 2007 Aug; 76(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 17708134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of pre-disease conditions in mass preventive examinations of the population].
    Paleev NR; Baevskiĭ RM; Berseneva AP
    Sov Med; 1990; (8):50-5. PubMed ID: 2274823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests.
    Thompson ML
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12925502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Performance evaluation (validation) of diagnosis].
    Röding H; Schenke K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1987; 112(16):1001-10. PubMed ID: 3673309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Present status and problems of mass screening--from the viewpoint of public health].
    Miyake K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):515-9. PubMed ID: 3093347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The periodic health examination: a useless test?].
    Roland M; Jamoulle M
    Rev Med Brux; 1998 Sep; 19(4):A255-62. PubMed ID: 9805954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests].
    Smets P
    Rev Med Brux; 1985 Sep; 6(7):451-4. PubMed ID: 4081407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer screening--benefits, harms and making an informed choice.
    Barratt AL
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006; 35(1-2):39-42. PubMed ID: 16489385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
    Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Screening. What documentation should be required?].
    Olsen J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 11831074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What routine medical tests do I need and how often should I get them? I'm a 64-year-old woman in relatively good health.
    Duke Med Health News; 2009 Mar; 15(3):12. PubMed ID: 19367771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
    Radack KL; Rouan G; Hedges J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 3755325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.